Industrial action at a Scottish university has been cancelled after an agreement was reached to resolve a dispute over planned job cuts.
Heriot-Watt University and the University and College Union (UCU) have been in detailed consultation since early August regarding the proposal to axe over 100 jobs.
Early in the consultation process agreement was reached to open a voluntary redundancy programme and to explore other ways to avoid potential compulsory cuts.
Following progress made via this voluntary process, the university has indicated that the ongoing change programme will continue without the need for compulsory redundancies.
On this basis, agreement has been reached to resolve the dispute and UCU has cancelled the industrial action, which was scheduled to commence from Tuesday.
The agreement sets out these commitments from the University and UCU, with both parties committing to working together to build their approach to partnership working.
This will be aligned to the strategic goals of the University and to the Fair Work agenda as set out by the Scottish Government, working alongside the other recognised trade unions to ensure timely engagement on matters of interest to all colleagues.
Professor Mark Biggs, Vice Principal and Provost, said: “The University and UCU have worked closely together with very regular dialogue to support colleagues and students through the current challenging times arising from the COVID19 situation. We are confident that this agreement, which resolves the formal dispute between us, marks a positive step forward for the whole University Community.”
George Bruce, Heriot-Watt UCU branch president, said: “Staff are relieved the threat to jobs is removed, and that we can now focus on providing the learning, student support and research that is so important to students, staff and the wider community. We are pleased that this agreement acknowledges the important role of trade unions and Fair Work as we move forward.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here