John Lennon 'would have liked to buy an entire county in Scotland', his sister revealed.
The Beatles legend, who would have turned 80 this year, had fond memories of childhood holidays north of the border.
And he longed to take his youngest child, Sean, to visit Edinburgh in 1981 - but never got the chance before he was shot dead in December 1980.
The Liverpudlian, who married artist Yoko Ono and had two sons, Sean, and Julian, from his first marriage to Cynthia Lennon, went to live in New York in 1971.
His younger sister, Julia Baird, 73, revealed she had a conversation with John where he said he would have bought Durness, Sutherland, in the Highlands, which had sentimental value to the family.
Julia and John were raised in separate households - she was raised by their mother, also named Julia, while he was raised by strict Aunt Mimi - but they both spent holidays with their cousins in Durness.
READ MORE: Sean Connery: Petition calls for Edinburgh airport to be renamed after James Bond actor
They also had family in Edinburgh, where Julia lived aged 11 after her mum died tragically after being hit by a car in 1958.
At one point, Julia almost asked John to purchase, not just the family croft in Durness, but the entire region, when the land was up for sale in the mid-1970s.
Julia said: "Our cousin David rang me and said we should get John to buy it, to which I replied, ‘we can’t ask him to buy a county’.
"Later on, John found out about it and said, ‘I wish I’d known – I would’ve bought it’.
"John’s love for Scotland is blatant there.
"He obviously had really fond memories."
Julia last laid eyes on John in the spring of 1969, shortly before a car crash in a borrowed Austin Maxi that resulted in John, Yoko, John's first son Julian and Yoko’s daughter Kyoko, being rushed to the Lawson Memorial Hospital near Inverness.
The siblings lost contact - until John had a fling with his PA, May Pang, who told him to get in touch with his family in 1973.
Julia said: “One thing we have to thank May Pang for was that she told him, ‘get in touch with your family’. "
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here