"ALARMING" differences in the effectiveness of widely-available reusable masks to deal with Covid-19, has emerged from new research.
Manufacturers and retailers have been urged to up their game on face coverings after a study found that the worst masks only managed to block out a "paltry" seven percent of potentially harmful bacterial particles from penetrating the mask material - allowing 93% to escape.
The study by the consumer organisation Which? concluded that three out of the 15 face coverings Which? tested performed so poorly that they were deemed a ‘Don’t Buy’.
In June, Scots shoppers were warned of the risks of buying face masks from online sites such as eBay, with scammers looking to take advantage of the coronavirus crisis.
Analysis by Scottish tech firm Vistalworks then found a large number of masks for sale which include false claims to be medical grade PPE, and it updated its free online checker tool embedded on the website of Scotland’s national consumer advice service consumeradvice.scot to warn shoppers of the risks.
With face coverings an essential purchase, Which? examined a range of options widely available in places like Asda, John Lewis, Boots, Ocado and Asos, and tested how well they filter bacteria, how breathable they are, and how they fare after multiple washes.
The study found that the best performing face coverings were able to block more than 99 per cent of potentially harmful bacterial particles from penetrating the mask material - similar to the standard of surgical masks.
At the bottom of the table and earning the lowest scores overall were a face covering from Termini8 sold at Lloyds Pharmacy (£2), one from Asda (£3) and one from Etiquette (£3), which is sold at Superdrug.
Which? said all were lightweight and breathable as they were made with only one layer, but this affected their ability to filter potentially harmful particles, earning each mask only one star out of five in this category.
The lab tests revealed that masks with multiple layers are much more effective than single layer masks at filtering particles.
They also revealed that almost all of the face coverings got better at filtering particles after being washed. Face coverings were re-tested after five hot wash cycles, and most improved, due to the fibres compressing.
Just two of the products got Best Buy status. The NEQI reusable face mask (£15 for 3), which is available from retailers including Boots and Ocado as well as Bags of Ethics Great British Designer face coverings (£15 for 3), available at Asos and John Lewis. They were both considered "comfortably breathable without compromising on filtration".
Which? found that there was a clear trade off between breathability and how effective the mask was at filtering potentially harmful particles.
READ MORE: Coronavirus - What you need to know about choosing a face mask
In fact, the fabric masks that scored five out of five for filtration were also those that scored the lowest for breathability.
If a face covering isn’t breathable, it can get damp more quickly with condensation from trapped breath and might encourage people to adjust or remove their mask, especially if they wear glasses.
Which? is urging manufacturers to use these findings as a basis for improving their products, while retailers should seek to ensure they are selling products that will effectively filter out potentially harmful particles. In the meantime, the consumer champion is encouraging consumers to research the best available options for themselves and their loved ones before making a purchase.
Natalie Hitchins, Which? head of home products and services, said:“With face coverings now such an important part of daily life, they not only need to be durable and comfortable, but also provide effective filtration from harmful particles in order to keep us and others safe.
“Our results prove that there is a huge difference in quality between reusable masks sold in stores around the country and online. We would urge manufacturers to use our findings to up their game and improve their products - Until then it is worth taking time to research the best option for yourself and your loved ones.”
ROR from Lloyds Pharmacy - seller of the Termin8 mask said: “We take the quality and efficacy of the products we sell very seriously and work with our suppliers to ensure they comply with UK regulations and standards. We have confirmed with the supplier of the Termin8 mask in question that it is compliant with all necessary requirements as set out by the Department for Health & Social Care and the British Retail Consortium, for use as a face covering in numerous public settings as required by UK law.”
Superdrug disputed the testing methods and said it was "disappointed" that the Etiquette mask was given a ‘Don’t Buy’ rating because it had been tested against the EN 14683 standard for surgical masks and the CEN Workshop Agreement which is not an official standard. This product was clearly retailed as a fabric face covering and not a surgical mask – designed to help the wearer reduce the spread of a cold or virus, as per Government guidelines.”
Asda added: “Product safety is our key priority and all of our George face coverings comply with and British Retail Consortium guidance and the Office for Product Safety and Standards. The covering that featured in this review was produced before the CWA17533 guidelines were published and is no longer on sale.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel