Grouse-shooting visitors to Scotland spent over £3,500 each this season, before a shot was even fired over the country's heather moors.
That's according to statistics from a visitor survey undertaken jointly by Scotland’s regional moorland groups and The Scottish Gamekeepers Association.
Survey papers were completed on 22 grouse shooting estates, helping to quantify the level of visitor spend in remote rural communities adversely affected by Covid 19 constraints.
And while there were less Grouse shooters from overseas this season because of the coronavirus pandemic and quarantine rules - each visitor spent an average of £3593.18 in local communities, before adding in shoot costs.
That represents an average spend of over £450 per day in some of the country’s most remote communities, with local accommodation, food, shops and garages all benefitting.
READ MORE: Scottish Greens call for end to grouse shooting
While average spend on car hire from air and ferry hubs saw nearly £327 per person going into the wider Scottish economy, the majority of the spend was in local, economically fragile areas.
The majority of respondents were internal UK visitors, with a smaller number from the Netherlands, and the average visit lasted one week.
This economic injection, at a critical time, dwarves the average spend per trip by overseas and domestic visitors to Scotland recorded in VisitScotland’s last insights report from 2018.
The tourism body’s Key Facts on Tourism in Scotland 2018 found that average overseas visitor spend in Scotland was £624 per trip, with £234 per trip spent by domestic visitors.
Despite Covid 19 impacting the grouse shooting season this year, the survey organisers believe the shoots which did go ahead will have helped businesses to survive and retain staff.
Lianne MacLennan, Co-Ordinator of Scotland's regional moorland groups, said: “A lot of work went into sector guidance with Scottish Government but the season was always going to be different, due to the pandemic and reduced overseas clientele.
“This survey shows how important grouse shoots are to fragile areas. There has been a lot of businesses very glad of having high spending visitors around during an awful year.
"Rural economies were disproportionately impacted by lockdown and we haven’t yet seen the end of unemployment and closures because of Covid 19."
Lowest rates of accommodation occupancy in Scotland are traditionally found in remote rural areas, highlighting further the importance of shooting parties to these dispersed regions.
The Dutch respondents in the survey spent an average of £3228.57 per person and used a mix of car, train, flight and ferry in order to fulfil their sporting holiday in Scotland.
Between them they spent £8850 on accommodation during their trip, boosting local providers.
Alex Hogg, Chairman of The Scottish Gamekeepers Association, said: “Most Government enterprise agencies and tourist bodies are fighting over themselves to attract high spending individuals to Scotland.
"Grouse shooting does this. Scotland has a premium product, in global terms, and the spend helps communities.
READ MORE: UK Gov adds grouse shooting to list of gathering exemptions
"It sustains land management jobs and keeps families in homes. With the economy set to shrink, there is a relief that we managed to get some visitors in, at all, for the grouse this year."
However, the Scottish Greens branded shooting a "cruel Victorian hobby" and called for an end to grouse shooting at the beginning of this year's season.
And the UK Government last month came under fire when grouse shooting and hunting was added to the list of exemptions for social gatherings.
As well as important life events such as weddings and funerals being exempt from the 'rule-of six' that came into force in September, grouse shooting and hunting parties were also allowed to meet in groups of up to 30 - in a move that faced heavy criticism.
You can read more about the key facts on Scotland's tourism in VisitScotland's report here.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel