Boris Johnson has warned there is a “strong possibility” that the UK will fail to broker a trade agreement with the EU as he ordered his Cabinet to prepare for no-deal at the end of the Brexit transition period.
The Prime Minister said the “deal on the table is really not at the moment right”, saying it would leave the UK vulnerable to sanctions or tariffs if it did not follow the bloc’s new laws.
Boris Johnson has said the UK could end up having a relationship with the EU after Brexit that is much more like the one Australia has with the bloc than Canada does.
But what does this actually mean, and is it the same as a no-deal Brexit?
Here’s how an Australian model could impact the UK.
Australia and the EU signed a "framework agreement" in 2017, adding on to an agreement signed which established a general principle of co-operation on areas including trade, foreign policy and security, development and humanitarian issues a decade before.
Is it the same as no-deal?
Australia does not have a free trade agreement with the Brussels bloc, so the bulk of its trade is carried out on World Trade Organisation (WTO) terms. Thus according to many critics, it would represent a no-deal outcome with the UK’s largest trading partner. Australia's deal with the EU is not a committed deal but rather one of good intent. As such some critics have said using the term "Australia-style" arrangement is simply a more palatable way of saying "no deal".
While Australia does not have a free trade agreement in place with Brussels, it does have a series of agreements on trade and other areas. An example of this is Australia’s agreements with the EU on the peaceful use of nuclear energy and scientific co-operation.
READ MORE: Brexit trade talks: When is the deadline? Is a No-deal Brexit likely and what happens next?
What would the economic impact be?
If the UK followed suit at the end of the transition period on January 1, following WTO rules it would result in tariffs being placed on many goods traded between the UK and the EU, with the addition of some quota restrictions and customs checks.
The UK and the EU trade far more with each other than Europe and Australia do and cross-Channel trade would consist of more complex manufactured goods, compared with Australia’s exports which are focused on raw materials. With more trade with the EU than Australia has, an Australian model may not be as beneficial for the UK.
The UK, for example, trades more than half of its goods into Europe, compared with just 11% for the southern hemisphere country.
Does the Australian model with the EU work for Australia?
Critics of Boris Johnson and his government have highlighted that while his administration has been espousing the virtues of trading with Brussels on similar terms to Australia, the Commonwealth nation is in the process of attempting to negotiate better arrangements with the EU.
Carl Bildt, co-chairman of the European Council on Foreign Relations, tweeted: “Prime Minister Boris Johnson talks about an Australia situation which he means no-deal with the EU.
READ MORE: What is the Good Friday Agreement and could the Northern Ireland Protocol be impacted by Brexit?
“He probably thinks it sounds better like that. Someone should tell him that Australia is actually busy negotiating a trade deal with the EU.”
Australia has been striving for a comprehensive free trade agreement with the EU since July 2018.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here