Staff at Heriot-Watt University have backed strikes in a dispute over moves to axe 130 jobs.
In the ballot of University and College Union (UCU) Scotland members, 77% of those who voted backed strike action on a turnout of 66%.
The union says the proposed job cuts are rushed and that alternative savings have not been properly explored.
The planned job losses also come on the back of a further 70 jobs having already been cut in 2017, UCU leaders said, adding that losing so many staff in such a short timescale was bound to impact on both the student experience and the university’s reputation.
It also said it remained open to negotiation, and wants to work with the employer to avoid the need for compulsory redundancies. The local branch is due to meet later this week to consider its next steps.
UCU Scotland official Mary Senior said: “By voting in these numbers UCU members at Heriot-Watt university have made it crystal clear today that they have no confidence in the university’s plans to cut jobs. The ballot result is a clear mandate for industrial action and to oppose job cuts.
“The employer has made good progress on seeking volunteers and should now take compulsory redundancies off the table, to give staff some job security and stability, and students the reassurances they need on the learning environment. It’s not too late for the university to avoid strike action but they need to act now.”
A spokesperson for Heriot-Watt University said: “We are disappointed with the outcome of the ballot.
"We will continue to work closely with our staff, our unions and our governing body to find the best possible way through the current financial challenges so that we can continue to deliver the changes needed to protect our future success as a university.
"We are continuing to work through staff applications for voluntary redundancy, and remain committed to achieving savings through this route wherever possible. We continue to meet regularly with our union colleagues in open dialogue.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel