President Donald Trump came out swinging against Dr Anthony Fauci, the press and polls that show him trailing Democrat Joe Biden in key battleground states in a disjointed closing message two weeks out from the US election.
On the third day of a western campaign swing, Mr Trump was facing intense pressure to turn around his campaign, hoping for the type of last-minute surge that gave him a come-from-behind victory four years ago.
But his inconsistent message, another rise in virus cases and his attacks on experts like Dr Fauci could undermine his final efforts to appeal to voters outside his most loyal base.
"I'm not running scared," Mr Trump told reporters before taking off for Tucson, Arizona, for his fifth rally in three days.
READ MORE: US election: Presidential debate commission adopts rules to mute microphones
"I think I'm running angry. I'm running happy and I'm running very content (because) I've done a great job."
His aggressive travel comes as Mr Trump plays defence in states he won four years ago, though the president insisted he was confident as he executed a packed schedule despite the pandemic.
"We're going to win," he told campaign staff on a morning conference call from Las Vegas.
He went on to acknowledge that he "wouldn't have told you that maybe two or three weeks ago," referring to the days when he was hospitalised with Covid-19.
But he said he felt better now than at any point in 2016. "We're in the best shape we've ever been," he said.
Seeking to shore up the morale of his staff amid growing private concerns that he is running out of time to make up lost ground, Mr Trump blasted his government's own scientific experts as too negative, even as his handling of the pandemic that has killed nearly 220,000 Americans remains a central issue to voters.
"People are tired of hearing Fauci and all these idiots," the president said of the government's top infectious disease expert.
"Every time he goes on television, there's always a bomb. But there's a bigger bomb if you fire him. But Fauci's a disaster."
READ MORE: Donald Trump brands the government's top infectious disease expert as 'a Democrat'
At a rally in Prescott, Arizona, Mr Trump assailed Mr Biden for pledging to heed the advice of scientific experts, saying dismissively that his rival "wants to listen to Dr Fauci".
The doctor is both respected and popular, and Mr Trump's rejection of scientific advice on the pandemic has already drawn bipartisan condemnation.
At his rally, Mr Trump also ramped up his attacks on the news media, singling out NBC's Kristen Welker, the moderator of the next presidential debate, as well as CNN for aggressively covering a pandemic that is now infecting tens of thousands of Americans every day.
Monday's professed confidence in victory stood in contrast to some of Mr Trump's other public comments in recent days reflecting on the prospect that he could lose.
"Could you imagine if I lose my whole life? What am I going to do?" he asked a rally crowd last week in Macon, Georgia.
"I'm not going to feel so good. Maybe I'll have to leave the country. I don't know."
In Janesville, Wisconsin over the weekend, he said it was not "even conceivable" that he could lose to a man he labelled "the worst candidate" in the "history of presidential politics".
Mr Trump has also expressed confusion about polling data that shows him trailing or closely matched with Mr Biden in key states, given the crowds of thousands he has been drawing at every stop.
"How the hell can we be tied?" he said at a rally in Carson City, Nevada, where polls actually show Mr Biden is ahead.
"What's going on? ... We get these massive crowds. He gets nobody. And then they say we're tied. ... It doesn't make sense."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel