COUNCIL bosses have warned that the climate emergency “could pose an even greater threat” than the pandemic amid calls for the economic model for local government to be overhauled.
Officials have also pleaded for help with the uncertainties around Brexit likely to “place enormous pressures on already stretched services and personnel” in local government.
The warning has been handed to MSPs in Holyrood’s local government committee in a joint submission by Cosla, the umbrella organisation for Scottish councils, along with directors of finance and chief executives of local authorities.
READ MORE: Scotland's councils 'facing £1bn budget gap' amid unprecedented crisis
In the evidence, councils warn that the climate emergency means that authorities “should not have to choose between the economy and the environment”.
It adds: “Instead, we need an economic model which can deliver the improvement needed whilst also delivering fair and sustained growth.
“In order to properly address the challenges in the health and social care sector, the widening inequalities amongst vulnerable communities, the attainment needs of children across Scotland and the immediate threat of climate change – Scotland needs a bold new approach to the delivery and funding of public services.
“Local Government can no longer be disempowered and constrained by pots of inflexible, ring-fenced funding that is focused on output rather than local outcomes. Local Government, and indeed Scotland as a whole, cannot afford to go back to ‘normal’.”
Local authorities have also warned that Brexit, coupled with the Covid-19 crisis, will “place enormous pressure” on services already under pressure.
They added: “There is likely to be additional requirements on council services such as environmental health and trading standards, as well as increased demand for services for vulnerable communities.
READ MORE: Scotland needs 'decisive action' to become carbon neutral
“There is an imminent need therefore for the Scottish Government to revisit its national planning assumption for EU exit and for this to factor in the impact of Covid-19 on communities, businesses and the wider economy.”
Cosla’s resources spokesperson, Gail Macgregor, told MSPs that councils need “as much financial security as possible”.
She added: “I hate to use the term perfect storm but there’s a number of things happening at once. Obviously, the climate emergency is focusing minds as well, but it can’t be delivered without significant revenue and capital investment across the council.
“Brexit is coming over the hill as well. We’ve already got a little bit of additional funding for extra environmental health officers. Councils over many years, due to previous budget cuts, have had to take out staff in environmental health and trading standards so at a point where we now actually need them to assist with Covid, as well as Brexit coming down the line, that lack of staffing in those departments could have a detrimental effect.
“The reality is that for councils to plan to cope with Brexit, to enhance and mitigate against climate change and to deliver all the key services we do, we will require sufficient funding to do that.”
Last week, union bosses warned that Scottish councils face a £1 billion black hole in their finances.
Ms Macgregor added: “We’ve seen a real-terms decrease in the grant coming to budgets every single year for the last 10, 11 or 12 years and things don’t get any easier.
“One of the difficulties that we have is that an awful lot of what we do is ring-fenced. Some of it is ring-fenced for good reason, other parts are ring-fenced and it doesn’t give us the flexibility to utilise that funding.
“Bluntly, whether I’m looking to the Scottish Government or the UK Government, local government needs additional cash and I will look to both governments for that.
“We will work creatively and efficiently to make the money stretch to do the job that it needs to do, but if there isn’t sufficient funding in the pot then something has to give.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel