MARGARET Ferrier may still be able to cling on to her £81,932-a-year job as an MP if she refuses to resign.
MPs can face sanctions from parliamentary authorities or be removed as an MP, but only in certain circumstances.
The ability to ‘recall’ an MP was created in 2015, following the parliamentary expenses scandal, and has been used three times since then. It would force a by-election in the Rutherglen and Hamilton West constituency, if 10% or more of the electorate there voted to remove the MP.
Read more: SNP face pressure to answer 17 questions over MP Ferrier
A recall petition can only be triggered if an MP is convicted and receives a custodial sentence, if they make false claims on expenses, or if the Committee on Standards submits a report ordering the MPs suspension.
While Ms Ferrier has reported herself to the Standards Commissioner, the commissioner cannot investigate criminality. She only investigates breaches of the parliamentary code of conduct, which takes place after any criminal investigation has concluded.
The code of conduct for MPs gives advice mainly relating to financial declarations, although an inquiry is currently ongoing into reviewing the code.
Standards Commissioner
If, following the police investigation, the Commissioner finds there is nothing remaining within her remit to investigate, a ‘recall petition’ would not be possible.
Possible breaches of the parliamentary code, which could be investigated, include over accountability, and openness.
Code of conduct
On accountability, the code states: “Holders of public office are accountable for their decisions and actions to the public and must submit themselves to whatever scrutiny is appropriate to their office.”
On openness, it states: “Holders of public office should be as open as possible about all the decisions and actions that they take. They should give reasons for their decisions and restrict information only when the wider public interest clearly demands.”
The clause on honesty does not cover all actions of MPs, but states: “Holders of public office have a duty to declare any private interests relating to their public duties and to take steps to resolve any conflicts arising in a way that protects the public interest.”
Proxy vote
Ms Ferrier applied for a proxy vote on Monday, it is understood, and would have had to give a reason for doing so to both the Speaker of the Commons, and the SNP whips.
However Nicola Sturgeon confirmed today that Ms Ferrier had told SNP whips that she had to travel home because a relative was unwell, and did not disclose her coronavirus test, or that she had tested positive. This may constitute a breach of the code.
Recall petition
If the Standards Commissioner does have grounds to investigate Ms Ferrier’s actions and a recall petition is lodged, Ms Ferrier would have to be suspended from the house for 10 sitting days. Constituents would then have to vote, and if the 10% threshold is met, a by-election would be triggered.
According to parliamentary rules, the party which last held the seat would get to decide when to hold the by-election. With the Holyrood elections due in May, it has been suggested the SNP could hold out until then to have one, if the opportunity arose.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel