Anger, frustration and sadness over the decision not to charge Kentucky police officers for Breonna Taylor's death has poured into America's streets.
Protesters have lashed out at a criminal justice system they say is stacked against black people.
Violence seized the demonstrations in her home city of Louisville as gunfire rang out and wounded two police officers.
Activists, celebrities and everyday Americans have been calling for charges since Ms Taylor, an emergency medical worker, was shot multiple times by white officers who entered her home during a drugs investigation in March.
State attorney general Daniel Cameron, a Republican and Kentucky's first black top prosecutor, said while the officers had a no-knock warrant, the investigation showed they announced themselves before entering.
A grand jury returned three charges of wanton endangerment on Wednesday against fired officer Brett Hankison over shooting into a home next to Taylor's with people inside.
Hundreds of demonstrators chanted Taylor's name and marched in cities including New York, Washington, Philadelphia, Las Vegas and Portland.
People gathered in Millennium Park, Chicago, chanting demands for justice as drivers in Michigan Avenue honked their horns.
Police in Atlanta unleashed chemical agents and made arrests after some protesters tried to climb on a SWAT vehicle.
In Wisconsin, peaceful marchers blocked traffic on an interstate and spoke about Ms Taylor on the steps of the state Capitol.
In Louisville, police said they arrested 127 people after what began as peaceful protests.
Officers declared an unlawful assembly after they said fires were set in bins and several vehicles were damaged.
A police statement also described the "looting" of several stores.
Interim Police Chief Robert Schroeder said a suspect was detained in the shooting of two officers, who are expected to recover from their wounds.
Along with George Floyd, a black man killed by police in Minneapolis in May, Ms Taylor's name became a rallying cry during nationwide protests that called attention to entrenched racism and demanded police reform.
Her image is painted on streets, emblazoned on protest signs and silk-screened on T-shirts worn by celebrities.
The FBI is still investigating potential law violations in connection with the raid at Ms Taylor's home on March 13.
After the announcement, Ben Crump, a lawyer for Ms Taylor's family, denounced the decision as "outrageous and offensive".
Mr Cameron said the officers acted in self-defence after Ms Taylor's boyfriend fired at them.
Kenneth Walker told police he heard knocking but did not know who was coming in and fired in self-defence.
The warrant was connected to a suspect who did not live there, and no drugs were found inside. The city has since banned such warrants.
"According to Kentucky law, the use of force by (Jonathan) Mattingly and (Myles) Cosgrove was justified to protect themselves," Mr Cameron said.
"This justification bars us from pursuing criminal charges in Miss Breonna Taylor's death."
US President Donald Trump read a statement from Mr Cameron saying "justice is not often easy".
He later tweeted he was "praying for the two police officers that were shot".
Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his running mate, Kamala Harris, called for policing reform.
Mr Biden said "we do not need to wait for the final judgment of that investigation to do more to deliver justice for Breonna".
He said the country should start by addressing excessive force, banning chokeholds and overhauling no-knock warrants.
"We must never stop speaking Breonna's name as we work to reform our justice system, including overhauling no-knock warrants," Ms Harris said on Twitter.
Hankison was fired on June 23.
The three wanton endangerment charges he faces each carry a sentence of up to five years.
A termination letter said he had violated procedures by showing "extreme indifference to the value of human life" when he "wantonly and blindly" fired his weapon.
Last week, the city agreed a settlement with Ms Taylor's mother, Tamika Palmer, which includes 12 million dollars (£9.26 million) and police reforms.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel