DOZENS of jobs across
12 retail units in Paisley are at risk of redundancy due to social distancing barriers imposed across a stretch of pavement on Glasgow Road.
Business owners took to the street this morning with protest plaques as they made calls to the council to take down the barriers – which they described as having a “detrimental” impact on their customer footfall.
Since the barricades were put in place, shop owners have seen their takings drop by as much as 40 per cent as customers can’t park their cars as they would along the stretch in front of their shops.
Dezmond Barr, who owns Sinclair Barr Newsagents and who is also spearheading the campaign, told the Glasgow Times: “After the hard last two months we have just had, our businesses are just starting to get back on their feet and we have now had these bollards imposed on us.
“There has been no consultation around the damaging impact these barriers will have on businesses in this area. There has been no detail of what the council are hoping to achieve from them.
“As business owners, each and every one of us is taking Covid-19 very seriously and we are adapting to make our businesses safe for our customers and employees. We’ve got no wish to be at heads with the council but it is hard when they make decisions that turn out to be detrimental for our business
livelihoods.”
The social distancing barriers are part of a £105,000 Spaces For People project that is meant to create an extra-wide pathway for pedestrians and cyclists.
One business owner named Jamie Henderson, who had to transform his shop in order to stay afloat, described the installation of the barriers as the “final nail in the coffin” for his eatery.
He said: “My business actually had to flip and reinvent itself after the barriers were installed. It was the final nail in the coffin for us if we didn’t reshape.”
Meanwhile, Hayley Barnes who owns So Beau beauty salon, told how her business is now inaccessible to elderly and disabled people due to the installation of the barriers. She said: “As well as causing us a loss to our business, it has massively affected my disabled clients who now can’t get in and out of my salon which is the last thing I want.
“We weren’t consulted and we were told they were going to be here for a matter of days… two months later, they’re still here.
“In that two months, I’ve noticed my footfall drop around 30 to 40 per cent. We just want them to be removed.”
A Renfrewshire Council spokesman said: “We’re sorry to hear of the issues being raised in relation to temporary barriers installed to widen the footway to enable physical distancing to take place, recognising the narrow pavement at this location which is a busy area, with a secondary school nearby.
“Unfortunately a press release on behalf of business owners relating to this has a number of inaccuracies which detracts from the important issues facing local businesses.
“To help clarify, neither Police Scotland nor Sustrans have raised any safety issues with us and the widened pavement is not a cycle lane, while no lane on Glasgow Road has been removed to accommodate the barriers and access to the bus stop has been maintained.
“We appreciate the importance of having parking available to access local facilities and there is ample parking at this location, both on the opposite side and elsewhere on Glasgow Road, on adjacent streets and at off-street car parks behind some of the businesses mentioned.
“Affected businesses were visited and notified in advance of the barriers being installed and again following their implementation, with their views considered alongside a review we commissioned to consider any improvements.
“This review has highlighted no safety concerns and we will take forward its recommendations in consultation with Sustrans and local business owners.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel