Scottish actor Robbie Coltrane has defended JK Rowling over accusations of transphobia and suggested people are sometimes too quick to take offence.
The Rutherglen-born star, who played gamekeeper Hagrid in the Harry Potter films, spoke out on behalf of the author who earlier this year attracted criticism for her comments on gender identity.
Read more: Daniel Radcliffe responds to JK Rowling 'anti-trans comments'
Ms Rowling strongly denies being transphobic, but the row was reignited this week when a review of her latest book, Troubled Blood, said it featured a "transvestite serial killer".
Speaking to the Radio Times, Mr Coltrane said: "I don’t think what she said was offensive really. I don’t know why but there’s a whole Twitter generation of people who hang around waiting to be offended.
“They wouldn’t have won the war, would they? That’s me talking like a grumpy old man, but you just think, ‘Oh, get over yourself. Wise up, stand up straight and carry on.’”
The 70-year-old Cracker star said he did not want to go further because of the strong reaction the topic provokes.
“I don’t want to get involved in all of that because of all the hate mail and all that s***," he said. "Which I don’t need at my time of life."
Ms Rowling was accused of being transphobic after responding to an article entitled “Creating a more equal post-Covid-19 world for people who menstruate”.
She tweeted: “‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”
Read more: JK Rowling and Noam Chomsky join high-profile figures in call for end to ‘cancel culture’
The 55-year-old writer defended her comments and said: “If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction. If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased.
"I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth.”
She was previously criticised by Harry Potter stars including Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel