Who is David Hume?
The 18th century philosopher David Hume, born in 1711, was born in Edinburgh and became an important figure in the Scottish Enlightenment over the course of his life.
Concerned with the tenets of philosophy, economics and history, Hume was known for his ideas on philosophical empiricism and skepticism and has long been celebrated as one of the finest Scottish philosophers of all time.
His most famous works included A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–40), An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751), An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1758) and his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779).
Hume died in his Edinburgh home after a long illness, and was laid to rest on Calton Hill in 1776.
Was David Hume racist?
The University of Edinburgh recently announced that the building that bears his name - David Hume Tower - will henceforth be known simply as 40 George Square - in a move to recognise the "distress" caused by "racist" comments made by Hume in 1753.
A petition launched by students citing Hume's links to the slave trade and claiming he “wrote racist epithets” attracted more than 1,700 signatures.
But what exactly did he write to cause offence?
In a footnote written in 1753, Hume said: "I am apt to suspect the negroes and in general all other species of men (for there are four or five different kinds) to be naturally inferior to the whites.
"There never was a civilized nation of any other complexion than white, nor even any individual eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences.
"On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the whites, such as the ancient GERMANS, the present TARTARS, have still something eminent about them, in their valour, form of government, or some other particular.
"Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen, in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction betwixt these breeds of men.
"Not to mention our colonies, there are NEGROE slaves dispersed all over EUROPE, of which none ever discovered any symptoms of ingenuity; tho' low people, without education, will start up amongst us, and distinguish themselves in every profession.
"In JAMAICA, indeed, they talk of one negroe as a man of parts and learning; but 'tis likely he is admired for very slender accomplishments, like a parrot, who speaks a few words plainly."
He later went back to revise the first two lines before his death.
The 1776 revised version read: "I am apt to suspect the negroes to be naturally inferior to the whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that complexion nor even any individual eminent either in action or speculation."
What has the University of Edinburgh said on the matter?
The University said the decision was taken to remove his name from the campus building because of "sensitivities" around asking students to use a building named after an 18th century philosopher whose comments "rightly cause distress today."
The statement read: “It is important that campuses, curricula and communities reflect both the university’s contemporary and historical diversity and engage with its institutional legacy across the world.
“For this reason the university has taken the decision to rename – initially temporarily until a full review is completed – one of the buildings in the central area campus.”
It added: “The interim decision has been taken because of the sensitivities around asking students to use a building named after the 18th century philosopher whose comments on matters of race, though not uncommon at the time, rightly cause distress today.”
The university said the decision was taken ahead of a “more detailed review of the university’s links to the past” and work is “considering many other issues beyond the naming of buildings”.
What are people saying online?
Not everyone is happy with the decision, with some taking to social media to claim it is unfair to hold Hume up to present day standards of morality.
However, others have highlighted that although his name will be removed from the front of the building, his work will continue to be read and studied within its walls.
Another social media user asked how the University's actions would help "improve the lives of black people today."
In the past two years we've hired two Hume scholars. His work will continue to be researched and taught at the university. He just won't get his name on a tall, brown tower block. Calling everything 'cancelled' means you get to overlook this distinction: I guess that's the point. https://t.co/I8ZHz5kcH0
— Aidan McGlynn (@AidanMcGlynn) September 12, 2020
David Hume being cancelled aswell now . . . These cancellations are coming thick and fast, good! Because until you face up to your tawdry past your future outlook is either a bleak representation or fake flim-flam fawnery for the hard of thinking.
— GaZ (@8tbitG) September 13, 2020
I do not agree with this decision. David Hume’s thought has inspired me throughout a 20 year career working to further constitutional democracy in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. As an employee of Edinburgh University I was not consulted in this. https://t.co/uRV19e052H
— Dr Asanga Welikala (@welikalaa) September 13, 2020
It's not clear to me how cancelling David Hume - whose racist views are not what he is known for; views which are consistent with his intellectual milieu - is meant to improve the lives of black people today. https://t.co/y0HQVnoaU9
— Tomiwa Owolade (@tomowolade) September 12, 2020
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article