Incomplete monitoring of instruments by flight crew is “the norm” among pilots due to how the human brain works, an an expert has revealed.
Inquiries into a fatal helicopter ditching that claimed four lives are currently underway.
Steve Jarvis, an expert on human factors in the aviation industry, said the monitoring of instruments by flight crew has arisen as an issue in many helicopter crashes, and pilots can struggle to maintain attention when looking at autopilot.
He said that normally the resilience of the system helps protect the aircraft.
Two crew and 12 passengers on the Super Puma L2 survived when it ditched on its approach to Sumburgh Airport, Shetland, at 6.17pm on August 23 2013.
READ MORE: Mercy Maguma: SNP MP raises plight of family with Johnson
But Sarah Darnley, 45, from Elgin, Moray; Gary McCrossan, 59, from Inverness; Duncan Munro, 46, from Bishop Auckland, County Durham, and George Allison, 57, from Winchester, Hampshire, all died in the incident.
The research scientist said pilots can suffer from “vigilance decrement”, which is when it becomes harder for them to remain vigilant over time when monitoring instruments.
An AAIB report published in 2016 found the pilots failed to properly monitor the flight instruments and failed to notice their speed was decreasing until it was too late to avoid the Super Puma plunging into the sea.
Sheriff principal Derek Pyle, who is hearing the fatal accident inquiry (FAI) asked: “What we are talking about is incomplete monitoring, are we not?”
Mr Jarvis replied: “I suppose we are but what I’m suggesting and what I’ve seen in my research is that incomplete monitoring is actually the norm and the resilience of the system is what happens most of the time and that protects it.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Inverness care home first to trial tracking technology
“It’s not because the pilots are just getting degraded or anything, it’s because deep inside the human brain things are happening which we have not really fully understood at this point and the aviation industry has been really good at making systems resilient enough to deal with that but until we get an even better understanding that next tiny step probably won’t happen.”
Martin Richardson QC asked Mr Jarvis: “Should the issue of monitoring by the flight crew at Sumburgh be seen as an isolated incident?”
Mr Jarvis replied: “No. One reason is that for many accidents and incidents monitoring has come up as an issue.”
He said more research is needed into why pilots do not notice certain things over time.
Mr Jarvis said he does not believe the Sumburgh accident had anything to do with vigilance decrement but was a result of a collection of circumstances, with the issue of monitoring combined with other things.
Asked how likely it is that such an accident will occur again, he said it is a very rare event.
He told the inquiry, which is being held virtually due to coronavirus measures: “With so many factors coming together in this particular case the odds of this happening were very very low, because it would need a whole lot of things to come together in a kind of perfect storm.”
Survivor Samuel Bull took his own life in London in 2017, which Mr Pyle said was “directly caused” by the crash.
A statement of agreed evidence read at the start of the inquiry confirmed no mechanical fault was discovered with the helicopter, which was returning from the Borgsten Dolphin support vessel to Sumburgh Airport when it ditched.
The inquiry continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here