In May this year, Mark Logan, the former COO of flight booking company Skyscanner, was commissed by the Scottish Government to conduct a review of the Scottish tech sector and how it might contribute to any post pandemic economic recovery.
Among his 34 proposals revealed last week is a call to treat computing science as an essential subject such as maths and physics. He also suggests incentives for universities to produce more home-grown software engineers, along with interventions to maximise the volume and success rate of spin-out companies. Logan further recommends the creation of a new network of hubs for tech start-ups.
We asked three prominent figures from Scotland’s tech ecosystem what they thought of the proposals...
Colin Hewitt, CEO, Float
I’m delighted to see the endorsement of CodeClan and incubators like CodeBase and eco-system investment in the likes of Turing Festival and EIE. Also in more regular meetups like TechMeetup, Startup Grind and Product Tank.
I’d also like to see the universities funded to employee more “entrepreneurs in residence”, bringing in talent annually from the global market. The funnel works in reverse too – we need more Mark Logans and Gareth Williams to become the educators and the mentors, we’re badly missing at the moment.
The other suggestion is that at board level, I see too many start-ups being hampered by boards that are pushing them in the wrong direction and not helping them get where they need to be. Board level education and startups that are struggling with angels on their board with very little tech experience is demoralising and distracting for fledgling startups.
We’ve been very grateful for small grants in the early days in the form of Launch.ed and the Scottish Edge. These grants make the top of the funnel and we need more of them.
Jane Morrison-Ross, CEO ScotlandIS
I’m very supportive of the Logan report, we do need to take a national, strategic and whole systems view of how we build a digital nation.
Education and skills has to be at the heart of it – if we do this properly, from primary onwards, we could build a nation of confident, empowered children and young people.
It’s not just about computing science or software engineering, though, it’s maths, creativity, critical thinking and confidence building. It’s rebranding computer science, it’s putting creativity back into tech, it’s embedding digital skills into every subject.
Lets not underestimate our colleges and universities either – we have a national tertiary education network that can deliver accessible, accelerated digital skills. We have an industry that is ready and willing to collaborate and get behind this, and we have SDS working hard to create change.
We must break down silos at school, in tertiary education and between sectors and disciplines. An ecosystem is good – a permaculture is better.
Stephen Ingledew, CEO FinTech Scotland
“Time for action” are the three words sum up the Logan review. The pragmatic and action oriented recommendations are progressive, perceptive and pivotal to a thriving technology innovative ecosystem. Furthermore , the review stands out as a role model template by which all Government initiated reviews should be based on.
Much is rightly be made of the focus on developing people tech skills and fuelling innovation funding, however, the value of the ‘third leg’ of the technology ecosystem, namely infrastructure must also be acted upon.
Further developing the physical and virtual environments through infrastructure enablers would bolster the innovation environment for both ‘home grown’ entrepreneurial talent across the generations as well as a globally diverse creative spirit which thrives on the value of inclusivity.
In fact, Mark Logan emphasises the importance of the Review’s complete comprehensive package being acted upon rather than comprising as separate initiatives.
The proposed balanced scorecard to measure the integrated progress will be an essential accountability tool in delivering this on both an economic and social level.
- If you would like to become a partner in our Future of Education Series, contact Stephen McDevitt, Head of Digital and Branded Content campaign@heraldandtimes.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here