SCOTTISH Conservative leader Douglas Ross has launched a bid to scrap controversial hate crime legislation.
He said the SNP Government should withdraw its proposed Hate Crime Bill and "go back to the drawing board".
It follows widespread concerns over the legislation, which critics say would stifle freedom of speech and criminalise a "mere insult".
The Scottish Police Federation, the Faculty of Advocates, the Catholic Church, media groups and leading authors are among those to have raised objections.
The legislation would update the characteristics protected in law from hate crimes and introduce offences for behaviour likely to "stir up" hatred, whether this was done intentionally or not. This would expand on existing laws protecting racial groups.
Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf insisted the Bill is needed to "modernise and consolidate hate crime legislation and provide clarity".
He said there is "clear support behind the need for the Bill", adding: "I am resolute in the need for improved hate crime legislation but I am also very alive to the need to consider carefully the concerns that have been raised."
Mr Ross said his party will bring forward a debate in the Scottish Parliament on Wednesday to vote that the Hate Crime Bill be withdrawn.
This would not be binding on SNP ministers, but would allow parties to express their opposition.
He drew comparisons with the SNP's controversial named person scheme, which aimed to appoint a state guardian for every child in Scotland and was scrapped last year.
He said: “Whatever the original good intentions of this Bill were, the breadth and depth of opposition to its clear flaws are too strong for the SNP to try and force it through.
“We cannot allow such a blatant attack on freedom of speech in Scotland to progress any further.
“Everyone agrees on the need for legislation to tackle hate crime in Scotland.
"But by trying to fix a doomed bill that clearly needs to be reworked, we’re wasting time that the parliament needs to hold the SNP Government to account on care home deaths and their domestic record.
“We saw what happened with named persons. The SNP arrogantly persevered with a hopelessly flawed bill, costing the Scottish public millions, until they eventually saw sense and dropped it.
“We’re asking that opposition parties unite with the Scottish Conservatives to accelerate the process so the same mistakes as named persons do not happen again.
"The Hate Crime Bill is too important to allow it to progress with these attacks on free speech.
"The SNP must withdraw it and go back to the drawing board.”
The Scottish Government wants to pass the Bill into law before the 2021 election.
It is understood the Greens will not back the Tories' motion, and will instead propose amendments to the legislation.
Scottish Labour believes the Bill is flawed but that it should be rethought rather than scrapped.
Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokesman Liam McArthur MSP said his party "are strong supporters of robust action against the perpetrators of hate crime, and remain supportive of the overall aim of updating hate crime law".
He added: “However, the broad brush 'stirring up' provisions are such significant flaws that they risk undermining those aims.
“For this Bill to receive the support of the Scottish Liberal Democrats, these issues need to be addressed and the Justice Secretary must agree to remove any potential threat to free and open debate.
“We remain committed to working with ministers and others to help deliver legislation that is effective but strikes the proper balance in this complex and sensitive area of law.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel