SOME folk entered the world of wine appreciation via the likes of Blue Nun or Tiger Milk but for me it was a bottle of Australian shiraz that caught my attention. I was in a pub in Prestwick when serving as a Naval Airman in 1983 and the landlord was offering people a taste of this radical new wine from the land down under.
Up until then, my tipple was lager or if I was absolutely forced, a shot of rum so this dark, seductive liquid with an aroma the likes of which lager can only dream of was a world changer for me.
Since then, shiraz or syrah as it’s also known, has been a benchmark on which I've measured many vineyards because unlike merlot which you have to be a plonker to get wrong, shiraz needs a bit of concentration. Too much sun and the grapes can be overpowering, too little and the wine is way too peppery. Too much oak burns the taste a tad, and too little leaves the wine quite thin.
When the winemaker gets it right, however, you can expect ripe succulent autumn fruits, a waxy, almost fat palate, hints of spice and even a touch of that lovely smell you get off an old leather sofa. Thankfully, the world is awash with wine makers getting it right.
The Californians and of late the Chileans are producing some sublime examples if you like it ultra smooth while the South Africans give it a furry palate that's ideal for food pairing. If you like your flavours intense and distinct then Australia is still leading the pack folks.
Bramble Lane Shiraz, Australia
A gorgeous wine for the price with warm spicy autumn fruits on the nose and a rich palate of well-integrated fruit and tannins. The finish is long.
The Good Spirits Co, Glasgow £11.20
McPhersons Shiraz, Australia
If Mcphersons ever make a bad wine then I’ll eat my hat. Soft, brambly blackcurrants and warm plums with a gentle hint of spice on the finish. Gorgeous.
Oddbins £10.50
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel