WE appear to be getting used to the lockdown logic, where safety from one disease, ahead of all others, has become a trump card played over and over by politicians who continue to endorse and enforce restrictions on life and freedoms that one would only expect in a state of emergency.
To help understand how this state of being and limited living has come about I would recommend a little book called The Tyranny of Health, written by Dr Michael Fitzpatrick in 2001.
Here, Fitzpatrick gives an account of the rise of lifestyle politics, a politics built on the fragments of the collapse of the old left and the rise of the new where, in the 1990s, state intervention shifted from a focus upon industry and services and retreated into the realm of personal and family life and, most of all, into health.
Now, radical doctors, health experts and professionals turned themselves into solvers of social problems with, for example, the transformation of past structural issues, like poverty, being magically re-imagined as a matter of “health inequality”.
From being a separate sphere of life, health, health awareness and the management of the minutiae of behaviour became government priorities.
Not only was being healthy politicised, Fitzpatrick notes, it also became moralised, replacing traditional moral restraints with the new absolute of safety, where the idea of good and evil was repackaged with notions of “safe” and “unsafe”.
Here we see the moral elevation of health, the beginnings of an approach to life that could and would, given the right conditions, result in the health service becoming sacred.
Only at a time when collective organisations and interests had evaporated and the public was divided, could this interventionist approach into our private lives and behaviour become an accepted norm. The “worried well”, a growing section of young middle-class health obsessives, became a new model army for endorsing and promoting an atomised outlook (or in-look), where staying healthy and constantly striving for “wellness” became both a political and personal fixation.
The lockdown logic is not a conspiracy, it is the result of the logic of a diminished political elite and the loss of a collective public. A situation within which a wider social sense of what is good for society has been lost in a sea of atomised anxieties encouraged by an empty political class that has lost any sense of the common good.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel