A GROUP of Scots enthusiasts have teamed up to correct tens of thousands of Scots Wikipedia entries after it emerged at least a third of articles were written by one American who can’t speak the language.
Ryan Dempsey posted to Reddit after discovering more than 20,000 articles on the Scots version of the site were created by the US user who doesn’t “seem to have any knowledge of the language at all”.
He found that the user, who has been contributing to the site for six years, appeared to have written out articles in English and looked up individual words using online Scots translators – then left words for which no replacement could be found in their English form.
READ MORE: Watch: ‘Politically suicidal’ Richard Leonard left red-faced after horror FMQs
In a statement the group complained that having Scots “replaced with the dressed-up skeleton of another language is cultural vandalism at an unprecedented scale”.
Dempsey, from Northern Ireland, is passionate about the language after studying it – and is now part of a group of nearly 50 Scots speakers dedicated to going through the articles to translate them into actual Scots.
“Among Scots enthusiasts [Wikipedia] has kind of become a running joke, the quality of it and how divorced it was from how actual Scots is spoken,” Dempsey said.
He told The National: “It’s a language which has to deal with a lot of ridicule from people who aren’t really familiar with it and one of the ways they might have tried to become more familiar with it is looking up Wikipedia articles in it.”
Dempsey cited one “ridiculous” example where entries went wrong. In the submission for Telekinesis, the description was written in neither Scots nor English and read: “Telekinesis es a form of movnig ebjocts with yor maind.”
The group wants people to know that Scots is not a “mangled” version of English. “It’s its own living language with its own syntax, its own grammar, its own lexicon,” Dempsey said.
While the American user has now deleted his online accounts, Dempsey hopes that after the argument blows over they will learn Scots properly and provide a “positive contribution”.
Alistair Heather, the Scots writer and presenter, told The National that the articles were “harmless”.
He said the “Anglo-centric” view of Wikipedia means that for the smaller languages there’s “less and less reliable stuff”, created by fewer editors. “With Scots there’s loads of good content on there – but because there’s not that many folk working at it and not that many folk going on there, it left this big empty space,” Heather said.
He went on: “I think the good folk of Brechin, Peterhead and Kelso don’t give a s*** about this ... The reason it doesn’t matter is because if Scots speakers were engaging with Scots Wikipedia, the pages wouldn’t exist.”
READ MORE: SNP ministers drop annual 'economic case for independence'
The presenter believes this will change as the Scots version of Wikipedia becomes more of an important resource in the future, and is updated along the way.
Until then, the “Scots Wikipedia editors” Facebook group is inviting more Scots speakers to join their effort.
They are seeking anyone with fluency in, or good familiarity with, Scots to “chip in and help repair some of the damage” during their August 30 “editathon”.
Heather is hosting a new Scots language interview show on the Hands Up for Trad Facebook and YouTube pages, beginning on September 27 with author Ross Sayers.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel