I AGREE with Gordon Evans (letters, August 24) who castigates former Holyrood Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill, regarding Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi. I was disappointed on first learning about the Justice Secretary's view that the convicted man, whose terminal illness was the ostensible motive for freeing Megrahi from prison in Greenock, was, indeed guilty of the crime – that was Mr MacAskill's stated view, though during that period following the trial at The Hague, he delivered at least one speech in parliament worthy, in my opinion, of a Moderator's eloquence at the opening of a General Assembly in Edinburgh. It has since seemed to me that Mr MacAskill was astutely enjoying possession of his big slice of cake while taking the opportunity of a few quiet bites. He stood on a moral high ground of mercy while keeping sides with those who said "guilty as charged". This despite compelling evidence and huge doubt, including a huge payment to a key witness against Megrahi, that in itself could, and likely should, have compelled a retrial.
For the sake of the convicted dead man's family it is to be hoped that despite the gap in time a verdict more amenable to the cause of justice will be reached.
Ian Johnstone, Peterhead.
READ MORE: Sturgeon pressed on overseas students testing ahead of 'biggest movement of people since lockdown'
VESTED INTEREST
DR Sanjeev Kanoria, in advising your readers about healthcare financing (“Here's how to fund care of elderly”, The Herald, August 22) clearly has a vested interest in the topic. As your footnote states, he gave up working as an NHS surgeon, and founded a care home business. This is now a huge commercial enterprise, with well over 30 homes. It is small wonder that Dr Kanoria is asking for more funding for the private sector, which needs to feed the appetite of its investors. It is significant, in this context, that he totally fails to mention the urgent need for improved wages and conditions for care workers.
Dr Kanoria complains that politicians refuse to set a date for a public inquiry. Setting up a public inquiry would of course delight the commercial profit-based sector, because it would delay – possibly for years – the radical changes that we need to start working on now, to create a genuine national care service on the same lines as our beloved NHS.
Michael Otter, Kinlochbervie.
READ MORE: Tenet (12A) review
THE CONE GATHERERS
WHEN our family arrived at Machrie, Arran, from Dundee for our annual and eagerly anticipated summer holiday in the 1950/60s, one of the first duties of the three children was to cycle to the pine trees near Morton's farm to collect cockabendies to assist in igniting the fire in our rented house.
Like your reader Fiona MacQueen (Letters, August 25), I have never heard of this word being used outwith our own family. Very interesting to see it feature as Scots Word of the week after all these years.
David Gray, Ayr.
IN my native village, Carradale, Kintyre, pine cones were called cockabendies. Over the years I have asked people brought up in all corners of Scotland if they were knew pine cones as cockabendies and nobody did. Recently I put the question to a friend brought up in Lossiemouth, and for the first time found someone who knew them as such.
Catherine Staines, Edinburgh EH12.
TIMBER TIMBRE?
I WAS interested to see the candidates for Tree of the Year 2020 ("Ancient Scots trees go out on a limb to battle for prized title", The Herald, August 23). Perhaps in a similar vein we could have a Plank of the Year 2020. I can think of several politicians worthy of being nominated.
Michael Watson, Glasgow G73.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here