AN SNP women's rights activist who has thrown her hat into the ring to contest a high-profile seat at next year’s Holyrood election has hit out at one of the party’s MPs for conspiracy theory comments as part of a BBC documentary on the Alex Salmond trial.
Lee-Anne Menzies has put herself forward alongside former SNP Westminster leader Angus Robertson and ex-MSP Marco Biagi to be selected by her party to contest Ruth Davidson’s Edinburgh Central seat at May’s election.
Joanna Cherry dropped out of the race amid a row over internal SNP rules.
But Ms Menzies, who is also a national committee member of the Women for Independence group, has claimed the SNP needs to “look long and hard at who we elect into our parliaments” after East Lothian MP Kenny MacAskill, a key Alex Salmond ally, claimed the former first minister’s accusers had given “entirely false” evidence in court.
Mr MacAskill was quizzed over an alleged conspiracy theory around Mr Salmond’s court case, where he was cleared of all 13 counts of sexual assault in March.
As part of the BBC documentary, presented by Kirsty Wark, Mr MacAskill claimed that “there was collusion going on to try and both encourage the police and indeed bring down Alex Salmond”.
Mr MacAskill was asked what evidence he had of any consipracy, but instead said he can “only operate in the speculation that has been given to me”, adding that “they were worried about the return of Alex Salmond and therefore they decided to put him out”.
He added: “I’ve had discussions with several people, more than several people and indeed from different sectors – within law enforcement, within Alex Salmond’s camp and indeed elsewhere.
“So this is tittle-tattle and I can’t claim to have the hands on it, but there are individuals who gave evidence who I know, because I’ve been a member of the SNP and they were long-standing like me. I believe their evidence to have been entirely false.”
Nicola Sturgeon has previously branded any suggestion of a conspiracy theory as “a heap of nonesense”.
Ms Menzies, who has previously run for selection against Mr MacAskill, said that his comments were the “biggest disappointment” of the programme.
She added: “This is a former justice secretary who knows that a criminal threshold not being met doesn’t mean anyone lied or gave false testimony. Yet, here he is claiming that this is the case because he knew the person.
"This is the same man who claimed that Mark MacDonald was 'a silly wee laddie' after he admitted inappropriate behaviour towards women.
“If we want to reform Scotland and get a fairer, more diverse and equal society then we need to look long and hard at who we elect into our parliaments.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel