EXPERIENCE is one of the few advantages of old age, especially when it comes to politics.
My first experience of political activism was canvassing for Donald Dewar in Aberdeen in 1966 and 1970. In electoral terms, that was a relatively successful period for Labour, being in office for 11 years between 1964 and 1979.
From the mid-60s, however, many of us were aware that something nasty was happening.
The Militant Tendency was increasingly influential, turning the party in on itself.
READ MORE: New poll puts support for Scottish independence at 55%, flipping 2014 result
Constituency meetings were dominated by those who talked class politics, but wouldn’t have recognised a worker had they bumped into one. Time was frittered on esoteric and pointless motions.
Why do the hard miles governing and fighting for the underdog, when you could be rooting out the philosophically and politically impure in your own ranks?
Labour’s internal turmoil opened the door to 18 years of Thatcherite government.
The independence movement can learn much from 1970s Labour. Clearly, there are those within who find government too hard work.
Like 1970s Labour, they endlessly debate issues of little interest or relevance to the majority. When tired of that, they brief and plot against their own side. As President Truman nearly said, “If you want a friend in politics, get a dog.”
Those of us old enough to bear the scars of the 70s see history repeating itself.
Like Labour, the SNP is an umbrella which shelters many perspectives and causes. To borrow an analogy, it’s a melting pot on a cold fire. In that context, leadership is always going to be a difficult, sometimes impossible.
The emergence of the Alliance for Independence (AFI) presents yet another self-inflicted challenge.
The inevitable fragmentation and navel-gazing brings to mind Monty Python’s Life of Brian. “Excuse me, are you the Judean People’s Front? F*** off! We’re the People’s Front of Judea.”
As Labour played into the hands of Thatcherite Tories in the late 70s and 80s, so the emerging divisions within the independence movement can only benefit its opponents. The ego-driven machinations of yesterday’s men, and one in particular, will undermine confidence amongst those wavering about the wisdom of independence.
READ MORE: Scottish independence poll: Two new polls put Yes vote out front
Furthermore, Keir Starmer’s revitalised Labour may well appeal to former supporters currently resting in the SNP camp.
Most Scots have little interest in the “great game” of politics and are turned off by internal bickering and manoeuvring. Instead, they respect hard work and competence.
By turning in on itself, the independence movement risks snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. It has much to learn from 1970s Labour and the Judean People’s Front.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel