LISTEN more tolerantly is my advice to Douglas Cowe (Letters, August 11), who jibs at Glasgow presenters for what he'd say is misuse of "went" that should be "gone", and mispronunciation of "December". What about th "'r" sound added to all those 'w'-ending words when London presenters tell us to 'drawer' the curtains or that a football result was a 'drawer'. And (starting a sentence with a conjunction, dear dear!) variously everywhere, the daft failure to substitute "led" for "lead", different of course for "read" where "red" isn't an option.
I suspect there are myriad instances of misuse of language in all its multiple genres or categories. But (not again!) it is prudent to be mindful that language lives with people and isn't in a glass jar in a museum, nor is it the preserve of scholars. Today's slang can be tomorrow's formal usage, individual words forsake their meanings for new ones, standardisation and innovation co-exist in language evolution. Etymologists wouldn't, I am sure, want it any other way, no more than most of the rest of us would.
Ian Johnstone, Peterhead.
FIT’S yon chiel frae Newmachar , Douglas Cowe, complainin’ aboot (Letters, 11 August)? There are many accents and manners of speech in the country which should surely be respected and encouraged.
His letter reminds me of primary school around 65 years ago when a teacher made us pronounce "Bible" round the class by rote, making it clear that something approximating to “bye-ble” was to be achieved; pretty difficult in Leith. I’m also reminded of a play produced, I think in Easterhouse, a few years ago with the long title, “There’s nothing wrong with my accent but there may be something wrong with your ears.”
John C Hutchison, Fort William.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel