Douglas Ross has refused to reveal details of his discussion with Ruth Davidson four days before his predecessor as Scottish Conservative leader resigned.
Mr Ross told journalists on Friday that a visit paid by the former party leader on July 26 was private and would be kept as such.
News of the meeting came to light on Thursday - the day after Mr Ross was appointed as leader. No other challengers put themselves forward for the post.
Mr Ross, the MP for Moray, has asked Ms Davidson to lead First Minister’s Questions for his party on his behalf. He plans to stand for a seat at Holyrood next year.
READ MORE: Tom Gordon: New Scottish Tory double act gets off to a stumbling start
But he said Ms Davidson will not be his deputy and he is expected to announce his front bench team in the coming days.
Jackson Carlaw stood down as leader of the Scottish Conservatives with immediate effect n the evening of July 30.
His shock resignation came just hours after facing Nicola Sturgeon in the Scottish Parliament, and he said he felt he was not the right person to lead the party.
Mr Ross told the PA news agency on Wednesday that he had not had any discussions with party members before he announced his plan to stand for the leadership the day after Mr Carlaw’s resignation.
On Friday, he said: “I’m sorry it adds to speculation, but it was a private meeting.”
READ MORE: Mark Smith: Is Douglas Ross thinking what you are thinking?
Mr Ross added that if he ever has a private meeting with a journalist, they can be assured he will not tell other media organisations what it was about.
He continued: “What I have said is that I asked Ruth and she agreed to lead First Minister’s Questions for me if I become leader only after Jackson resigned.
“I hope that gives you some reassurance on that point.”
Mr Ross added that he is not afraid to stand up to the UK Government once more if it is in the interest of the people of Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel