FAMILIES of those impacted by infection outbreaks at a super hospital controversy have demanded an inquiry must “get to the bottom” of the scandal.
A public inquiry, chaired by Lord Brodie, beings today into the ventilation and building systems at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH) in Glasgow, as well as issues at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children and Young People in Edinburgh – which saw the opening of the facility delayed just days before it was due to open last year.
Concerns were brought to light over possible water contamination in the QEUH and the risk of infections last year, with a report published in June saying that cancer patients were put at a higher risk of infection due to the design and maintenance of the building.
However, no avoidable deaths were said to have taken place, according to the review.
Opposition politicians have demanded the inquiry does not become a “whitewash” but Health Secretary Jeane Freeman has suggested she would like to see it look further afield, particularly at the culture within the health service, and listen to the expertise of staff members.
Molly Cuddihy, who has bone cancer, contracted a rare infection at the Glasgow hospital in 2018.
Her father, Professor John Cuddihy, told the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland programme that the inquiry must investigate long-standing issues with “trust, transparency and accountability” at QEUH.
READ MORE: QEUH: Senior medic says bird poo infections 'most likely came from hospital'
Professor Cuddihy added that families are “very pleased that the public inquiry will be conducted and an independent examination of very many issues that have been highlighted”.
He said: “I think first and foremost that when you receive the news that your child has contracted cancer, and following that treatment that they may then have contracted a bacteria whilst within the hospital, nothing will change that.
“No public inquiry, no Crown Office inquiry will ever change the heartache that that brings.”
He added: “However we must have confidence in a system that allows us to get to the bottom of exactly what happened when the hospital was opened. “Was the water contaminated? Was there issues with the ventilation? And if so, how did this impact on the safety and security and wellbeing of our children.”
Scottish Tory health spokesperson, Miles Briggs, said the investigation is likely to shed light on “systemic failures”.
He added: “Lord Brodie has a wide-ranging remit to take as much evidence as he feels necessary, and the parents have been promised they will be satisfied by the scope of the inquiry.
READ MORE: QEUH: Freeman must stop whistleblowers being victimised
“For their sake, and those of parents across Scotland, this inquiry cannot whitewash the role of the SNP government and successive Scottish health secretaries.
“Experts and parents have already expressed forceful concerns about what has happened at QEUH and also the Sick Kids construction project — itself an awful saga more than a decade long.
“The public confidence has been shaken and it must be restored quickly. In years to come, this inquiry will be viewed as a landmark moment in Scotland and it has to be done right.”
READ MORE: Family of QEUH Cryptococcus patient 'suspicious' NHS statement timed to avoid post-mortem
Ms Freeman has stressed that “safety and well-being of all patients and their families is my top priority and should be the primary consideration in all NHS construction projects”.
She added: “The inquiry is a critical next step in seeking to understand the issues that affected both the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital campus site in Glasgow and the Royal Hospital for Children and Young People and Department of Clinical Neurosciences site in Edinburgh. It will also make recommendations to ensure that any past mistakes are not repeated in future NHS infrastructure projects.
“The inquiry’s remit and terms of reference are detailed and comprehensive and I was pleased to have had the opportunity to consult with Lord Brodie, party spokespeople and patients and families during the drafting process.”
READ MORE: Scottish hospitals inquiry: Here’s what you need to know
She added: “I have always been clear that those who have been affected deserve answers to the many questions they are entitled to ask – and this is an important step in delivering that.
“It is a statutory public inquiry and this means it will have the power to require witnesses to attend and to disclose information relating to the inquiry’s work. It is entirely independent and its conduct, procedures and lines of enquiry are a matter for the chair.
“I would like to again extend my thanks to Lord Brodie for agreeing to act as chair. I wish him and his team well in taking forward this important work.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel