The UK’s chief EU negotiator David Frost and his EU opposite number Michel Barnier have given their verdicts to the media at the end of a round of “intensified talks” in London.
Here are some of the key points to emerge:
– There are still ‘considerable gaps’ between both sides in key areas
Despite progress in some areas, Mr Frost warned “considerable gaps remain in the most difficult areas”.
Meanwhile on the EU side, Mr Barnier said: “This week again the UK did not show a willingness to break the deadlock.”
A senior UK official said issues over the level playing field, fisheries and a mechanism for resolving trade disputes remain outstanding.
READ MORE: Sturgeon attacks Johnson for 'crowing' about the Union amid Covid deaths
– An ocean remains between the UK and EU on fisheries
One of the biggest areas of difference remains around the UK’s post-Brexit fisheries policy, with Mr Barnier describing the UK’s position as “simply unacceptable”.
He told a London press conference: “On fisheries, the UK is effectively seeking for near-total exclusion of fishing vessels from the UK’s water. That is simply unacceptable.”
Mr Frost said until the UK is able to control its fishing grounds “then it will be difficult to reach an agreement.”
A senior UK Government official close to the talks later confirmed a deal on fisheries is unlikely unless the EU accepts that the UK will control who can fish in British waters after the transition period.
– Playing hardball on the level playing field
The EU is concerned that the UK is straying from the previously agreed political declaration in terms of its approach to the so-called level playing field arrangements.
Mr Barnier said: “On the level playing field, the UK still refuses to commit to maintaining high standards in a meaningful way. On state aid, despite a clear warning in the political declaration, very clear, we have made no progress at all.
“This is all the more worrying because we have no visibility on the UK’s intention on its future domestic subsidy control system and regime.”
– The UK wants its sovereignty to be respected
Mr Frost said the EU must respect the UK as “an independent state”.
He added: “When we began this intensified negotiating process a month or so ago, the Prime Minister set out the principles to (European) Commission president Ursula von der Leyen that were intrinsic to our status and future as an independent state.
“And the EU has heard some of that but it hasn’t heard all of it and the big underlying difficulty is the fact (the EU) hasn’t yet recognised it needs to adapt its position to those principles if we’re going to reach an agreement.”
– However, there is hope that a deal can still be reached, possibly in September
Both sides believe a deal is possible, with the UK’s chief negotiator saying a deal is “possible in September”.
Mr Frost said in a statement: “Despite all the difficulties, on the basis of the work we have done in July, my assessment is that agreement can still be reached in September, and that we should continue to negotiate with this aim in mind.”
But if not, then October is the latest point for a deal to be reached, Mr Barnier warned.
READ MORE: EU negotiator warns post-Brexit trade deal ‘unlikely’
He added: “By its current refusal to commit to the condition of open and fair competition, and to a balanced agreement on fisheries, the UK makes a trade agreement at this point unlikely.”
Mr Frost said: “We’re in a negotiation. Either outcome is possible. We will work energetically to get a deal but it is possible we won’t reach one.”
– The UK’s negotiator reveals he has a ‘good relationship’ with his EU counterpart
Despite the cut-throat nature of the talks between both sides, Mr Frost said he enjoys a “good relationship” with his EU opposite number.
He added: “It has been very nice to meet face-to-face, and famously we have had a few dinners in this building and elsewhere in recent weeks.
“We get on well and I like to think we are both professional negotiators, we both have a position to deliver and we get on with doing that.”
Informal talks will resume next week, with the next round of negotiations planned for the end of August.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here