NICOLA Sturgeon has accused the UK Government of "negligence" in the face of potential Russian interference.
The First Minister said Boris Johnson and his ministers "should be taking greater steps to find out" whether Russia tried to interfere in the Scottish and EU referendums.
She said an Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) investigation "seems to be very explicit that they haven't even bothered to look into" the Brexit vote.
Ms Sturgeon's comments followed the much-delayed publication of the ISC report following an 18-month inquiry.
It found Russian influence is the "new normal", while the UK Government only belatedly realised the threat to political processes despite alarm bells ringing over the 2014 Scottish referendum.
READ MORE: Westminster rules out probe into Russian meddling in Brexit
The committee said intelligence agencies and Government departments treated the issue as a "hot potato" with no-one getting a grip on the problem.
The UK Government said there was "no evidence" of successful Russian interference in the Brexit vote but the committee – which oversees the work of Britain's spies – suggested that there was no proper investigation.
MI5 provided just "six lines of text" when asked whether there was secret intelligence on the issue of potential Russian meddling in the referendum.
The UK Government – led by prominent Brexiteer Boris Johnson – has rejected the committee's call for a full analysis of whether Vladimir Putin's government did attempt to influence the result of the 2016 vote.
Elsewhere, the committee said there was "credible open source commentary" indicating Russian influence campaigns in relation to the Scottish independence referendum in 2014.
Ms Sturgeon was asked about the new report during a coronavirus briefing.
She said: "I would say firstly, we should not be at any point complacent about the possibility of Russian interference in our democratic processes.
"Secondly, I don't think you can really draw any conclusions from the three lines or thereabouts that the report has on the Scottish independence referendum, but I would include that in my general remarks about not being complacent about Russian interference, although I would say that the Scottish independence movement and the values I and my party stand for I don't think could be further removed from the kind of values that Vladimir Putin and the Russian regime stand for.
"On the Brexit referendum, it appears that the committee concludes that there's no evidence of interference there because the UK Government hasn't looked for it.
"And that brings me to my last point... I do think the main message out of an initial reading of this report would be what I think could possibly be described as negligence on the part of the UK Government in the face of potential Russian interference.
"I hope that this report leads to a much more rigorous approach and to the UK Government taking these threats to our democratic processes much more seriously than they appear to have been doing so far."
Ms Sturgeon said intelligence and security matters are reserved to the UK Government and are not the responsibility of Scottish ministers.
READ MORE: Committee asked if Alex Salmond is 'defacto agent' of Russia
Asked if she thinks Russia tried to interfere in 2014, she said: "I only know what I read in the report this morning, which is about three lines and a footnote, which seems to suggest that the only evidence the committee was able to source was open source – it wasn't UK intelligence or security information.
"I don't know that. But what I'm saying is the UK Government should be taking greater steps to find out, whether it's about that part of our democratic process or the Brexit vote where the report seems to be very explicit that they haven't even bothered to look into that.
"This is a report that has been kept hidden from the public for months.
"Now that it's out there, I think the questions that should be asked are for the UK Government who are the government responsible for intelligence and security matters."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel