By Stephen Goldie
THE Lord President of the Scottish court system, Lord Carloway, recently called for primary legislation to assist the recovery of our courts. It is unlikely that anyone involved in working with the Scottish Courts and Tribunal Service (SCTS) would disagree that tinkering round the edges won’t work.
The underlying issue is one of volume. As the UK and Scottish Governments start to role out plans for economic recovery, there are complex contractual issues and debts accumulating for businesses and people to deal with.
As a result of Covid-19 restrictions, most hearings scheduled for March to August were discharged creating an inevitable backlog.
The Law Society is working with the SCTS on solutions, with some practical steps for immediate implementation underway. More people have embraced the introduction of technology (the digital civil court process could be within our reach given modern document management systems and the adoption of electronic signatures); more alternative dispute resolution can encourage settlement and alleviate the backlog (is it time for a compulsory mediation rule in commercial actions with expenses consequences?); and more remote case management via telephone and video conference is well under way.
The lesson here is clear, that we cannot, and should not, go back to what we were doing before. Measures can always be introduced to ensure that access to justice is preserved for all. There will be cases where parties do not have access to the necessary IT, so appropriate provisions will have to be made. Yet many users of the court service already have the technology to support remote and efficient progress of cases – something we will need to help with pent-up demand.
The efforts of the courts to pivot towards remote hearings is to be applauded. We have, of course, been doing that in the commercial court for years but Covid-19 has put a big hand on the back of us all to move towards greater remote efficiency and there could well be cost savings for clients (and the court system itself) as the dust settles.
Solicitors and advocates, combined with the judiciary and the SCTS, are all shouldering the responsibility to work together on solutions. Lord Carloway stated that the court and tribunal system should be a service, and not just a place, where access to justice is administered for people and businesses.
Leaving to one side the important function of the criminal courts –the ongoing health situation and economic impacts in Scotland will inevitably lead to greater demand on the civil courts.
There is a genuine willingness in Scotland’s Commercial Courts to move forward with dates for virtual trials. There are cases where that can work but there will be some cases where the interests of justice and fairness could dictate otherwise. Likewise, health and safety concerns and risk assessments will be important considerations for all involved for some time. Recent guidance from the Scottish courts is starting to bring further clarity which will allow progress here.
Access to justice with effective remedies for parties in distress is an essential pillar of our society. The process of change has commenced and there is an opportunity for primary legislation to augment the steps already under way. With some further investment and careful planning, we should have an opportunity to set up a more modern civil justice system which will be fit for purpose for years to come.
Stephen Goldie is Head of Litigation at Brodies LLP
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel