European Union leaders could be "very reluctant" to allow the UK to rejoin their group, but could welcome an independent Scotland into the trading block, an expert has claimed.
Kirsty Hughes, who was the director of the Scottish Centre on Europe Relations (SCER), said the issue of an independent Scotland joining the EU was a completely different question to whether the UK could ever be allowed back in.
If Scots voted for independence in a legally binding referendum, she forecast there would be "complete openness" from the 27 EU nations to allowing entry.
- READ MORE: Michel Barnier travels to London for Brexit trade deal talks
Speaking at a webinar organised by the European Movement in Scotland, she said: "On the Scottish side I think there is complete openness if Scotland was to vote Yes in a constitutionally and legally valid referendum.
"There is complete openness to welcoming another small, northern European country into the European Union."
She said this would not be the case if "there is a big stand-off over a referendum between London and Edinburgh".
But she added that not only was Scotland seen as pro-European, given the vote to remain in the EU in 2016, she said that its "politics looks more normal at the moment".
The expert added: "Frankly any big country applying to join the EU, whether it is Turkey or Ukraine or the UK, is always much more problematic usually than a smaller country."
Speaking about the UK's prospects for rejoining, she noted that politicians in Europe had been left feeling "disappointed, upset, angry and many other things at the Brexit vote".
She continued: "I think the EU would be very reluctant in the near future to welcome a penitent UK back.
"It would have to be more than penitent, it would have to be one that had clearly worked through all its political, democratic, constitutional problems and come out the other side of that."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel