The former principal of the University of Aberdeen has been asked to return more than £100,000 after the university was found to have wrongly awarded the six-figure sum upon his retirement.
Sir Ian Diamond, who was principal at Aberdeen until 2018, revealed his plans to retire from the role in August 2017.
He subsequently received £601,000 in remuneration for 2017-18, on top of a £60,000 payment for “outplacement support”.
In February this year, the University of Aberdeen returned the same amount of £119,000 after the Scottish Funding Council found that the settlement with professor Sir Ian Diamond was agreed upon without a proper assessment of value for money.
READ MORE: Aberdeen University repays cash over principal pay-off
In essence, the university paid for two principals in 2018-19, with Sir Ian on “gardening leave” while his successor was in place and his 12-month notice period only beginning after he had left the post in 2018.
As a result, the university's governing body has now invited the ex-principal to "consider a repayment of the same amount to the university."
READ MORE: Scottish university one of the top ‘Golden Age’ institutions in world rankings
Esther Roberton, senior governor at Aberdeen University, said: “Following publication of the Scottish Funding Council’s review into the payment made to the university’s former principal, a small internal working group was formed to undertake a review and address findings of that report.
“Court – the university’s governing body – met yesterday and considered the working group’s report. A series of actions to be taken by the university in response to the SFC report, around responsibilities, guidelines and governance procedures, were approved.
“Court also resolved that as the SFC had required the university to repay a proportion of its grant in respect of the settlement made to the former principal, we should invite him to consider a repayment of the same amount to the university. The university repaid £119,000 to the SFC in February.
“Decisions reported on in the SFC review were taken three years ago. Now the university has new leadership and is progressing with a new strategic vision.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here