An aristocrat who says he and his estranged wife should fight over money in a Scottish court instead of an English one has lost a Supreme Court battle.
Charles and Emma Villiers, who lived near Dumbarton and separated after 18 years of marriage, are divorcing in Scotland, but they disagree about whether arguments should be heard in an English or Scottish court.
Mr Villiers says that because divorce proceedings are taking place in Scotland, any fight over money should also be staged in Scotland.
READ MORE: Coronavirus in Scotland: Ryanair resume flights to Europe today
His estranged wife, who now lives in England, disagrees.
Supreme Court justices ruled against Mr Villiers on Wednesday after analysing the dispute at a Supreme Court hearing in London.
Mr Villiers had appealed to the Supreme Court after losing fights in the High Court and Court of Appeal in London.
Lawyers say the ruling could have implications for other divorcing couples.
A judge based in the Family Division of the High Court in London began considering the dispute in 2015.
READ MORE: Sturgeon and husband must give evidence under oath in Salmond inquiry
Mrs Justice Parker said any fight over the division of money should take place in England.
In 2018, three Court of Appeal judges in London upheld that decision and dismissed an appeal by Mr Villiers, saying divorce proceedings in Scotland and a money fight in England were not “related actions”.
Mr and Mrs Villiers are listed on peerage genealogy website www.thepeerage.com.
Lawyers representing Mr Villiers say he is a relative of the Duchess of Cornwall.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here