NICOLA Sturgeon’s flagship plan to bring superfast broadband to every corner of Scotland could be timed-out after accusations of “manifest error” in the contract process.
Scottish ministers have admitted that a legal challenge to the biggest element of the £600m R100 scheme could cause it miss a crucial cut-off date at the end of the year.
The Government’s legal team told Scotland’s highest court that ministers considered it “extremely important” that the challenge be dealt with “in its entirety” by then.
READ MORE: Opinion: Iain Macwhirter: Sturgeon's economic recovery won’t be about de-growth but jobs, jobs jobs
If not, the Government feared the contract would no longer “enjoy the protection” of the European state aid deal that underpins it, as this expires on December 31.
Opposition parties said the R100 rollout, which was meant to help bridge the digital divide between town and country, was now in a “perilous situation”.
The legal challenge has been brought by a failed bidder for the most lucrative part of R100, which covers the north of Scotland and is worth almost £400m.
Ministers have been accused of failing in their “express duties” under procurement law and of “manifest error” in the awarding of the contract to BT.
The revelation is the latest blow to R100, which is supposed to install 30Mbps+ connections to the most remote corners of the country, but has been beset by delays.
In her 2016 manifesto for Holyrood, Nicola Sturgeon promised to “deliver 100 per cent superfast broadband coverage for Scotland by the end of the next Parliament”.
But delivery has now slipped to the end of 2023 for the £83m Central Scotland part of the programme and to summer 2024 for the £133m South of Scotland element.
The Scottish Government signed contracts for both areas with sole bidder BT last year, and these parts now appear to be secure.
However the biggest slice of the R100 programme, the £384m North area contract covering 100,000 premises in the Highlands and Islands, Angus, Aberdeen and Dundee, remains up in the air.
After ministers announced BT was also the preferred bidder for the North Lot, the decision was challenged by a rival bidder, Oxfordshire-based rural broadband specialists Gigaclear Ltd.
Energy minister Paul Wheelhouse told MSPs about the challenge in December, and later said that until it was resolved the contract was “on hold”, and the government could not discuss what it might ultimately deliver.
He also announced a voucher scheme for premises not wired in by the end of 2021 to help them get some form of alternative internet.
The state aid threat to the North area roll-out emerged during a Court of Session virtual preliminary hearing on Wednesday.
Mark Lindsay QC, for Gigaclear, said his client primarily wanted the award of the contract to BT to be “set aside”, with financial damages a “secondary remedy”.
Mr Lindsay said the challenge was about “manifest error” in the procurement process and related bid scoring, involving technical issues which may require evidence to be led in court.
He said Gigaclear believed Scottish ministers had failed in their "express duties" under the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2015.
The court heard Gigaclear wanted the dispute resolved through a substantive proof hearing of around eight days, but that this might not take place until October.
Mr Lindsay added: “The state aid cover expires at the end of the year and clearly it’s in the interests of both parties for this action to be resolved before then.”
Solicitor Advocate Christine O’Neill, for the Scottish Government, said the public funding for the R100 programme was made possible by a state aid approval [the 2016 National Broadband Scheme] which runs until the end of 2020.
She said: “That approval expires on 31 December this year. There is a concern that if the contract cannot be awarded by then it will not enjoy the protection of that [scheme].”
She said any ongoing legal proceedings that suggested the procurement process broke the law “may also prove to be an obstacle to ensuring protection of the state aid cover”.
She added: “From ministers’ perspective, it is extremely important that this matter is dealt with in its entirety by the end of the year.”
Lord Clark agreed the matter should be dealt with “as soon as possible” and gave the two sides five weeks to fine tune their cases before a procedural hearing.
He noted that, given the pressure on his own diary, a proof in October may have to be taken by another commercial judge.
The hold-up adds to the humiliation of Rural Economy Secretary Fergus Ewing, who in 2018 vowed to quit if the R100 target date of 2021 was missed.
“If I don’t deliver this by 2021, I think it will be time for Fergus Ewing to depart and do something else, and leave the job to somebody else. But I can assure you, we’re on the case,” he told the Scottish Land and Estates conference.
Far North Liberal Democrat MP Jamie Stone said: "This is an extremely perilous situation for the rollout of the R100 programme. The SNP's promise of superfast broadband for everyone by 2021 is already at least two years behind schedule.
READ MORE: Poll: Majority of Scots in favour of extending Brexit transition period beyond December 31
“Rural communities have endured years of delays and excuses on its failure to install much needed digital infrastructure to equip rural areas with quality broadband. “The impact of that has been felt during this pandemic as businesses and school children wrestle with snail-like speeds.
"Businesses and residents in the north of Scotland deserve much better than this."
A Scottish Conservative spokesman added: “The SNP talks a good game on broadband for rural areas, but its action has been non-existent.
“Scotland can’t fulfil its economic potential until these issues are sorted out.
“Instead, it seems like the SNP government is closer to the courtroom than to the broadband coverage it’s repeatedly promised.”
Energy Minister Paul Wheelhouse said: “Ministers clearly place a very high priority on enabling access to superfast broadband services across all of Scotland, at the earliest opportunity, including in the North Lot area.
“Access to digital connectivity has perhaps never been of greater value than at present, given it has played such a pivotal resilience role during the Coronavirus pandemic. “It would be inappropriate to comment on the legal proceedings themselves while they are ongoing.”
Gigaclear Ltd declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel