FINANCE Minister Kate Forbes has warned she will be trying to recover from the economic crisis “with one hand tied behind my back” unless more tax-raising and borrowing powers are handed to Scotland.
Ms Forbes told MSPs that if she had full fiscal autonomy, where all tax raised in Scotland is spent by Holyrood, she “would be able to respond fully to some of the needs” of the crisis.
But Scottish Labour has warned that with an “£8 billion existing budget gap” and £4 billion needed to tackle the Covid-19 crisis, full fiscal autonomy would “lead inevitably either to higher taxes across the board or deep and savage cuts to public services.”
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Kate Forbes: UK Government not giving Scotland enough cash to deal with Covid-19
Kate Forbes told MSPs that the Scottish Government does not currently hold the powers she would like in order to borrow more funding, as the UK and other governments can.
The Finance Secretary has called on Westminster to plug a gap of £500 million she claims there is between the extra costs of tackling the pandemic and the money passed on from Westminster – or hand over more powers.
Ms Forbes said that the Scottish Government being given wider borrowing powers would allow it to “respond to the exceptional circumstances in which we find ourselves in line with the response made by every government around the world”.
She added: “If we cannot see the borrowing limit extended, then at least give us the right powers for the right reason, in order to manage the uncertainty.
READ MORE: John Swinney: Businesses must help schools re-open as next year's exams could face axe
“I think if we had full fiscal autonomy, we would be able to respond fully to some of the needs. That’s not what I’m asking for here, but what I’m asking for here is some pretty basic powers and flexibilities around the borrowing issues.”
She has also called on the UK Government “guaranteeing a baseline level of consequentials” rather than estimates.
She added: “Because this is a fixed budget, because, by law, I cannot overspend, if this year requires extraordinary spending in order to save lives and save the economy, then I will be hamstrung or at least I'll be doing it with one hand tied behind my back.
"Whereas the UK Government is able to borrow more to meet the needs, we cannot and therefore if there's a pressing need in one part of the budget it will need to be taken from elsewhere."
Ms Forbes added that if she is forced to move funding around within the budget, it would "lead to austerity".
She claimed if the UK Government was not allowed to borrow money to deal with the crisis, they would need to shut down entire departments.
She said: "The UK Government is not funding its multibillion-pound, critically important interventions through re-prioritisation, because it can't.
"It would require complete departments to be shut down to fund the level of spend, which is absurd.
"I don't see why the people of Scotland should suffer and see a return to austerity, just because this Government doesn't have the basic powers to respond."
READ MORE: Kate Forbes: Expect 'deep cuts' to public services without new powers from Westminster
But Scottish Labour deputy leader and finance spokesperson, Jackie Baillie, warned that “Scotland is facing little short of an economic tsunami, with our economy endangered in a way we have not experienced before”.
She added: “Kate Forbes has stated that Scotland’s economy may be the hardest hit in the UK by the coronavirus crisis and that it may take longest to recover.
“With this in mind the £12 billion that Kate Forbes intends to borrow - £8 billion to close the existing budget gap and the £4 billion to tackle Covid-19 - would lead inevitably either to higher taxes across the board or deep and savage cuts to public services.
“In the midst of the greatest economic turbulence that we have faced in generations, taking action that would inevitably lead to not only a return to austerity but to austerity on stilts is simply unrealistic and unforgivable.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel