NICOLA Sturgeon has dismissed Alex Salmond’s claim that her allies conspired against him as "a heap of nonsense".
The First Minister trashed her predecessor’s allegation on BBC Newsnight, and said she would “have her say” and "elaborate on that view" in due course.
She also claimed she had been too focused on dealing with Coronavirus to say how she felt when she learned the outcome of Mr Salmond’s criminal trial in March.
READ MORE: Scottish fishermen sceptical industry won't be 'expendable' in post-Brexit talks
After Mr Salmond was acquitted of 13 counts of sexual assault at the High Court in Edinburgh, said he had been denied a chance to present evidence of a conspiracy.
His legal team had wanted to tell the jury the former MP was the victim of a politically-motivated plot by people in Ms Sturgeon’s orbit who did not want him back to return to frontline politics as a potential rival.
However judge Lady Dorrian refused to allow it in case the trial drifted off course.
Mr Salmond is now writing a book in which he has said he will present evidence of the conspiracy and how it culminated in his prosecution and trial.
On Newsnight on Wednesday, presenter Kirsty Wark interviewed Ms Sturgeon at the Scottish Parliament about the Covid crisis, but also Mr Salmond.
Ms Wark said: “He was a former close friends and mentor of yours and I wonder what you felt like when you heard the verdict?”
Ms Sturgeon replied: “The day I heard the verdict I was immersed in dealing with coronavirus and I’m not trying to kind of dodge the question but actually I was.
“Most of my - pretty much all of my thinking that day and in the days leading up to that and in the days since have been about coronavirus.
“Look, there’s going to be inquiries, parliamentary inquiries, where I will have the opportunity to have my say and be asked questions and scrutinised and you know, I’ll deal with that in the fullness of time.
“But right now, and at that point in time you’re asking me about, my focus on trying to deal with the immediate crisis the country is living through.”
The verdict was delivered on March 23, the same day the UK went into Covid lockdown.
However Scottish Government press officers regularly attended the trial to report back to Ms Sturgeon and her officials on its implications for the Government.
Ms Wark went on: “More people are becoming vocal alleging conspiracy around people close to you to bring him down. So what do you say to that?”
Ms Sturgeon replied: “There was no conspiracy. It’s a heap of nonsense.
“But I’ll, as I say, in the fullness of time get the opportunity to elaborate on that view.”
"There was no conspiracy" to bring down former First Minister Alex Salmond says Nicola Sturgeon, adding allegations to the contrary are "a heap of nonsense".
— BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) June 10, 2020
Watch the full interview 22:45 @BBCTwo@KirstyWark | #Newsnight pic.twitter.com/dX147qpqrh
After the verdict, Mr Salmond’s former SNP deputy leader Jim Sillars said the former First Minister’s book would be like a “volcanic eruption” for those at the top of the SNP.
Mr Sillars said the “rot” which would be exposed inside the party could be so bad that the Yes movement may need to set up a new party in it place.
Another ally of Mr Salmond, the East Lothian MP and former justice secretary Kenny MacAskill, also claimed “dark forces” had been at work around the trial.
He said there had been an “orchestrated campaign” by senior people in the Scottish Government and SNP who wanted Mr Salmond’s head “on a platter”.
He accused prosecutors of pursuing charges that were “utter bunkum”, and the police of mounting an inquiry of “gargantuan proportions” while complaining about their budgets.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel