A former MI6 chief has said he believes the origins of the coronavirus pandemic can be traced to the virus accidentally escaping from a Chinese laboratory.
Speaking on The Daily Telegraph’s Planet Normal podcast, Sir Richard Dearlove, who spent 38 years with Britain’s intelligence service, said he had seen a new scientific report that suggested the virus was engineered by Chinese scientists.
Experts widely agree that the virus originated in animals before being transmitted to humans.
Professor David Robertson from the University of Glasgow told the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee last month that there was “really no evidence” of the virus being man-made.
“I don’t think we’re clever enough to have designed this virus – it’s far too unique,” he said.
“There is really no evidence for this. We can all enjoy a conspiracy theory but you need to have evidence.”
However Sir Richard said a scientific paper published this week by a Norwegian-British research team suggested key elements in the genetic sequence of the virus were “inserted” and may not have evolved naturally.
The Daily Telegraph reported that in the study, produced by Professor Angus Dalgleish of St George’s Hospital at the University of London and Norwegian virologist Birger Sorensen, the scientists claim to have found “inserted sections placed on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike surface” which could explain how the virus binds with human cells.
In the podcast, Sir Richard suggested scientists may have been experimenting on bat coronaviruses when Covid-19 escaped.
He also raised the prospect of China potentially paying for the global damage caused by the pandemic.
“I do think that this started as an accident,” Sir Richard said.
“(The study is) a very important contribution to a debate which is now starting about how the virus evolved and how it got out and broke out as a pandemic.
“It raises the issue, if China ever were to admit responsibility, does it pay reparations?”
The Daily Telegraph reported the peer-reviewed paper has been re-written several times as some scientists dismissed its original conclusions.
An earlier version of the study, seen by the paper, claimed to prove “beyond reasonable doubt that the Covid-19 virus is engineered”.
Further analysis of the research, due to be released in the coming days, reportedly claims the Covid-19 virus has “unique fingerprints” that indicate “purposive manipulation” by humans.
“As this debate about the virus develops, I think all this material is going to be in print and is going to embarrass a number of people,” Sir Richard said.
The paper also reportedly warned that current vaccine efforts are doomed because the cause of the virus has been misunderstood.
The researchers are attempting to solve this issue by developing their own vaccine, according to the paper.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel