THE SCOTTISH Government has been warned that its system to replace exams this year is “totally unacceptable” amid calls for it to be improved.
Public body regulator, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), warned it is “concerned” over the Scottish Qualification Authority’s (SQA) proposals in place of exams being sat – while others have argued that basing grades on coursework and earlier performance at schools could discriminate against some pupils.
Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie quizzed Education Secretary John Swinney about the concerns.
Mr Swinney said the SQA will “meet its public sector duty" under the laws.
He added: “The SQA has a legal duty to undertake the appropriate equalities impact assessment and that will be undertaken.
"To young people I would say that I acknowledge the uncertainty and the difficulty the current environment poses for them – it's not the circumstance of their making.
“What the SQA will make sure is the case if the quality of certification around the country meets the required standards that we would all expect so there is consistency across the country.”
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Next year's school exams may be scrapped due to Covid-19 pandemic
But Mr Harvie said there are still unanswered questions over the fairness of the system.
He said: “The SQA has failed to provide any evidence that its replacement for this year’s exams will meet its legal obligations, and I’m disappointed that the Education Secretary was unable to reassure me.
“We are faced with a situation where pupils whose teachers believe they should pass will instead be failed by the SQA through no fault of their own, but rather because of the historic exam results of their school.
"This is totally unacceptable and requires an urgent change of direction from the Scottish Government.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel