DOMINIC Cummings drove to a beauty spot on his wife's birthday to 'test his eyes', he has claimed.
The senior adviser said he had taken a trip to Barnard Castle town with his wife and young son to check he was safe to drive back to London as his eyesight had been affected by coronavirus.
Mr Cummings made the trip, half an hour from where he was isolating with his family in Durham, on April 12 and drove back to London the following day.
His trip to the town was the same day as his wife, Spectator journalist Mary Wakefield, celebrated her 45th birthday.
In an unprecedented press conference this afternoon, Mr Cummings explained: "My wife was very worried, particularly as my eyesight seemed to have been affected by the disease.
"She did not want to risk a nearly 300 mile drive with our child given how ill I had been.
"We agreed we should go for a short drive to see if I could drive safely. We drove for roughly half an hour and ended up on the outskirts of Barnard Castle town.
"We did not visit the castle, we did not walk around the town."
The aide said the group sat beside the river for 15 minutes as he felt unwell, but then drove back to the farm, stopping once at woods beside the road so his son could go to the toilet.
Asked whether the public were expected to believe Mr Cummings' story about testing his eyes, Boris Johnson said it was plausible and his own eyesight had been affected by coronavirus.
Mr Johnson produced a pair of glasses from his jacket pocket and said: "I find I'm having to wear spectacles for the first time in years I think because of the effects of this thing, so I'm inclined to think that is very very plausible, that eyesight can be a problem associated with coronavirus."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel