Boris Johnson has backed his top aide Dominic Cummings, saying he “acted responsibly, legally and with integrity” when he drove 260 miles to County Durham to isolate with his family.
Mr Cummings says he made the journey for childcare purposes. Here is the timeline of events around his trip.
– March 23:
As the coronavirus crisis escalates, the UK is placed into lockdown with strict limitations on travel.
The Government guidelines state: “You should not be visiting family members who do not live in your home.”
– March 27:
Mr Johnson and Health Secretary Matt Hancock test positive for coronavirus, while chief medical officer Chris Whitty says he has symptoms of the disease and is self-isolating.
Transport Secretary Grant Shapps has told the BBC he believes Mr Cummings was last seen in Downing Street on the same day and speculates he may have travelled either on the 27th or 28th.
– March 30:
Downing Street confirms Mr Cummings is suffering from coronavirus symptoms and is self-isolating.
– March 31:
Durham police are “made aware of reports that an individual had travelled from London to Durham and was present at an address in the city”.
The force says officers “made contact with the owners of that address who confirmed that the individual in question was present and was self-isolating in part of the house”.
“In line with national policing guidance, officers explained to the family the arrangements around self-isolation guidelines and reiterated the appropriate advice around essential travel.”
– April 5:
An unnamed neighbour tells the Daily Mirror and the Guardian that Mr Cummings was seen in his parents’ garden.
“I got the shock of my life as I looked over to the gates and saw him,” they said.
The Guardian approaches Downing Street about the story, only to be told by a spokesman: “It will be a no comment on that one.”
– March 30 to April 6:
The period for which Mr Cummings’ wife Mary Wakefield describes the family’s battle with coronavirus, in the April 25 issue of the Spectator.
She makes no mention of the trip to Durham and describes the challenges of caring for their son while suffering the symptoms of Covid-19.
“This might be my only really useful advice for other double-Covid parents or single mothers with pre-schoolers: get out the doctor’s kit and make it your child’s job to take your temperature.
“Any game that involves lying down is a good game.”
READ MORE: Politics LIVE: Boris Johnson under sustained pressure to sack Dominic Cummings
– April 10:
Number 10 is again contacted for comment regarding Mr Cummings’ trip by the Guardian. Instead of defending the journey, officials decline to comment.
– April 12:
Mr Cummings and his family are apparently spotted out walking 30 miles away from Durham in Barnard Castle, according to Robin Lees, 70, a retired chemistry teacher, whose claim is reported by the Observer and Sunday Mirror on May 24.
– April 14:
Mr Cummings returns to work for the first time since news he was suffering from coronavirus emerged.
Questions are raised about his adherence to social distancing advice as he is photographed walking in Downing Street with fellow aide Cleo Watson.
– April 19:
An unnamed witness apparently sees Mr Cummings out walking with his wife in Durham, recognising him by his trademark beanie hat and overhearing him remarking that the bluebells are “lovely”. The claim is reported by the Observer and Sunday Mirror on May 24.
– May 13:
The Government lifts the restriction on how far people can drive to reach the countryside and take exercise, but visits and overnight stays to second homes remain prohibited.
– May 22:
News breaks in the Mirror and the Guardian of Mr Cummings’ trip to Durham.
While there is no comment from Downing Street, close friends of Mr Cummings say: “He isn’t remotely bothered by this story, it’s more fake news from the Guardian. There is zero chance of him resigning.”
– May 23:
Downing Street appears to be standing by the PM’s chief aide, saying in a statement: “Owing to his wife being infected with suspected coronavirus and the high likelihood that he would himself become unwell, it was essential for Dominic Cummings to ensure his young child could be properly cared for.
“At no stage was he or his family spoken to by the police about this matter, as is being reported.”
Speaking to reporters outside his home, Mr Cummings says: “I behaved reasonably and legally.”
When a reporter suggests his actions did not look good, he replies: “Who cares about good looks? It’s a question of doing the right thing. It’s not about what you guys think.”
Later at the daily Downing Street briefing, Mr Shapps says Mr Cummings has the PM’s “full support” and that Mr Johnson “knew that he was unwell and that he was in lockdown”.
Mr Shapps says it had always been permissible for families to travel to be closer to relatives as long as they “go to that location and stay in that location”.
Meanwhile, the deputy chief medical officer for England, Jenny Harries, says travelling during lockdown was permissible if “there was an extreme risk to life”, with a “safeguarding clause” attached to all advice to prevent vulnerable people being stuck at home with no support.
READ MORE: Mark Smith: The four stages of the Cummings crisis and the loophole that could still seal his fate
In a new statement released later in the evening, Durham police say officers were made aware on March 31 that Mr Cummings was present at an address in the city.
The force adds that the following morning an officer spoke with Mr Cummings’ father at his own request, and he confirmed his son had travelled with his family to the North East and was “self-isolating in part of the property”.
It says the force “deemed that no further action was required. However, the officer did provide advice in relation to security issues”.
In another evening statement, a No 10 spokeswoman accuses the Mirror and Guardian of writing “inaccurate” stories about Mr Cummings, including claims that he had returned to Durham after going back to work in Downing Street on April 14.
“We will not waste our time answering a stream of false allegations about Mr Cummings from campaigning newspapers,” the spokeswoman says.
– May 24:
Asked by a journalist outside his home whether he had returned to Durham in April, Mr Cummings says: “No, I did not.”
A host of Tory MPs call for him to resign or for Mr Johnson to sack him.
But the PM, who fronts the daily Downing Street briefing, firmly backs Mr Cummings, saying his aide acted in the best interests of his child, in a way “any parent would frankly understand”.
He insists Mr Cummings “acted responsibly, legally and with integrity”.
But the PM’s comments fail to quell anger among Tory MPs, opposition parties, scientists and even bishops – one of whom accuses Mr Johnson of treating the public “as mugs”.
Durham councillor Amanda Hopgood says she has written to Durham Constabulary’s Chief Constable Jo Farrell after being made aware of a number of sightings of Mr Cummings in the area in April and May.
Mr Cummings’ parents Morag and Robert defend him in an interview with the New Statesman, with his mother saying the family had been grieving after her brother – Lord Justice Laws – died on April 5 after contracting Covid-19 while ill in hospital, and his father saying he was “disgusted” at the way the press had treated his son during the coverage.
– May 25:
Education Secretary Gavin Williamson adds his support for Mr Cummings, saying he should not resign “because he has made it clear that he’s broken no rules and he’s broken no laws”.
Gloucestershire’s independent police and crime commissioner Martin Surl says Mr Cummings’ actions make a “mockery” of police enforcement earlier in the lockdown “when the message was very, very clear: stay at home”.
Tory MP David Warburton says his own father died alone as a result of the coronavirus lockdown, and that the Cummings story gives an impression of “double standards”.
Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon says she fears Mr Johnson is “putting his political interest ahead of the public interest” and adds that she hopes he will “reflect further” on the matter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here