NICOLA Sturgeon has appeared to accept that transferring hundreds of untested patients out of hospitals to care homes contributed to the scale of the coronavirus crisis.
The First Minister said that with the benefit of hindsight she would “come to a different conclusion” about moving so many vulnerable people without testing them for the virus.
The transfers took place when the Scottish Government was desperate to free hospital beds in anticipation of a “tsunami” of coronavirus patients.
The First Minister said the rate of deaths in care homes was "heartbreaking and will haunt many of us for a long time to come".
Almost half the 3546 deaths in Scotland attributed to Covid-19 have have been in home cares.
Health Secretary Jeane Freeman admitted last week that 921 delayed discharge patients - elderly people fit enough to leave hospital but without somewhere suitable to go - were moved to care homes in March alone.
Amid fears the transfers could spread the virus across Scotland’s 1000 or so care homes, opposition parties demanded mandatory testing for would-be residents for weeks.
However the Scottish Government did not bring in mandatory testing until April 21.
On BBC Radio Scotland, Ms Sturgeon denied officials or ministers had been reckless, and had acted in accordance with the best information available at the time.
However she conceded that hindsight put the transfers in a different light.
She also claimed leaving those elderly people in hospital may exposed them to “enormous risk”, despite the superior PPE and infection control regimes in hospitals.
Asked if she believed that sending more than 900 untested hospital patients into care homes may have been a contributory factor in the crisis, she said: “If I apply hindsight to that, I come to a different conclusion.
“But let me tell you the situation we were faced with at the time. These older people you’re talking about, the so-called delayed discharges, had no medical need to be in hospital.
“At that point we were getting ready for what we considered would be a tsunami or coronavirus cases to our hospitals, and hospitals as it turned out were under huge pressure.
“It would have exposed older people to enormous risk to leave them in hospitals at that point.
“People say there should have been more testing, and that again is a legitimate question.
“But again, what we knew then about the efficacy of testing of asymptomatic people is different to what we know now. “There’s still questions about the reliability of testing there.
“So what we did was put in place risk assessment, guidance in care homes.
“At every stage we have done what we thought was best, based on the knowledge we had at the time.
“Of course mistakes will have been made, and we learn as our knowledge of this virus increases. But the suggestion that any of us just acted recklessly or without due care and attention to older people is frankly one that is not true.”
The First Minister said she expected the issue of care homes would be examined by abn inquiry or inquiries in future.
At the Scottish Government daily briefing, Ms Sturgeon backed away from her morning comments, claiming she had been talking about making different decisions "in general terms" despite being asked very specifically about the 921 delayed discharge transfers.
Scottish Labour said reports of another 14 deaths at a care home in Tullibody highlighted the scale of the crisis in homes.
Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard said: “Serious questions need to be answered by the Scottish Government about the delayed discharge policy at the beginning of this pandemic and also the impact that a lack of Personal Protective Equipment and testing has had on the spread of the virus in care homes.
“At a time when we should have been protecting the most vulnerable in our society, it appears that in a rush to protect the NHS from being overwhelmed, care homes were badly let down.
“From the beginning, it was known that elderly people are more vulnerable to the virus, therefore it was inexcusable to discharge patients into care homes without first testing them - a policy that was in place for six weeks.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel