Boris Johnson's address to the nation was watched by millions across the UK and the world last night.
Many have criticised the mixed messages from the Prime Minister with the lockdown advice only applying to England, while others have said it was clear.
We look at how the media in Europe reported the public address from the PM and how they have viewed the UK's battle against Covid-19.
Please remember that the advice issued by the PM only applies to England and that a lockdown remains in place in Scotland.
France 24 focused on a ‘phased’ lockdown in England and mentioned the quarantine that would be in place in much of the country. They reported: “Britain will begin easing some coronavirus lockdown measures this week, but most will stay in place until at least June 1, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Sunday, as he unveiled cautious plans to lift restrictions imposed seven weeks ago." The paper also focused on the lockdown impact on France reporting: "French President Emmanuel Macron's office said on Sunday that the travellers coming from France will not be subjected to quarantine at this stage, adding that any such measure would be reciprocal and only be imposed after mutual consultation”.
French publication La Figaro led on the new alert system that was now in place in the UK, comparing it to the current terrorist threat levels. They reported: “The strategy of exiting quarantine is in stages is based on a new alert system, similar to what exists in the field of terrorism, to inform the British of the danger level of the pandemic”
Le Monde led on the division in the UK with Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales opting to keep the Stay Home message while England opted to change the message. They wrote: “It was one of the last European countries to confine itself, on March 23, and it now has the highest official death record on the continent (32,000 deaths from the Covid-19). Boris Johnson announced a three-phase reopening on May 13. Which was seen as a hasty decision for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, which decided to maintain lockdown.”
The Irish Times had an in-depth analysis piece stating that ‘Boris Johnson’s plan to ease lockdown measures faced numerous obstacles’ Denis Staunton reported that a lack of capacity in monitoring and questions over new messaging among issues facing the Prime Minister: “The new slogan “Stay Alert, Control the Virus, Save Lives” represents a shift of emphasis in the government’s messaging that could prove too subtle to be effective. The week’s loosening of restrictions on outdoor activity is less than straightforward, with some previously banned activities now permitted only for members of the same households while two members of separate households can meet if they stay two metres apart.”
Coronavirus: Johnson’s plan to ease Britain’s lockdown faces daunting obstacles
— Denis Staunton (@denisstaunton) May 10, 2020
via @IrishTimeshttps://t.co/toA94VbzSy
READ MORE: Opinion: Marianne Taylor: Don’t make garden centres a battleground for the coronavirus culture war
Suddeutsche Zeitung reported that Boris Johnson had announced a ‘cautious easing’ of the lockdown. They reported: The easing does not apply to all parts of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon called on the Scots to remain at home. The government's message in London to be vigilant was criticised as vague and imprecise”
El Espanyol reported that all of the measures suggested by the Prime Minister will be cancelled if the pandemic continues. They wrote: “Johnson will appear Monday in the House of Commons to elaborate on the plan and defend his strategy against the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel