THE UK Government is “actively looking at” quarantining people arriving from abroad as criticism mounts over the country dragging its feet compared to other parts of the world.
Currently, there are no health checks on passengers arriving into the UK.
Many other countries have banned all but their own citizens and residents from incoming flights - while other nations have regional restrictions.
SNP MP Joanna Cherry has written to Home Secretary Priti Patel, calling for health checks or Covid-19 tests at airports - while Health Secretary Jeane Freeman said decisions should be made “very soon” over ensuring people arriving cannot transmit the virus to the public.
There are reports the UK Government is set to force all arrivals to undergo two weeks of quarantine as they arrive in the country.
UK Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said the idea of quarantining overseas arrivals was being looked at by Westminster in a bid to further reduce the R-naught value, the infection rate between people.
Speaking on the Andrew Marr Show, Mr Shapps said: "I think it is important that as we are seeing the numbers decrease and the R rate we hope decrease... that we do ensure that the sacrifices in a sense - social distancing - that we are asking the British people to make are matched by anybody who comes to this country.
"I am actively looking at these issues right now so that when we have infection rates within the country under control we are not importing."
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Warning over deaths rise in coming years with cancer screenings halted
Speaking at the Scottish Government's daily briefing, Ms Freeman urged the UK Government to restrict transmission of Covid-19 from those arriving into Britain.
She said: “That power is reserved to the UK Government - we can’t close those ports, but I think we have made our position very clear.
“Given that it looks likely that all the sacrifices that people have made are being successful, in suppressing the virus, we think that the UK Government should take a very serious look indeed at the potential risk of inward transmission of the virus - and begin to consider very seriously and make decisions very soon about how that particular risk can be managed and managed effectively.
“We have seen it elsewhere and it should be something that we are able to do. We will continue to raise that with the UK Government and press for the right decision to be made.”
Mr Shapps admitted that fewer people would have died from Covid-19 in the UK had testing capacity been ramped up sooner - but he urged people not to “jump to conclusions” in analysing the death toll.
Asked whether fewer people would have died if testing capacity had been greater sooner, he said: "Yes.
"If we had had 100,000 test capacity before this thing started and the knowledge that we now have retrospectively I'm sure many things could be different.
"The fact of the matter is this is not a country that had - although we're very big in pharmaceuticals as a country - we're not a country that had very large test capacity."
Mr Shapps said it was too early to compare Britain's excess mortality from coronavirus to other countries.
"There are other factors taken into account on excess mortalities which we won't know about today - for example what does it do in terms of other illnesses and diseases?"
He added: "We shouldn't look at the raw data and jump to conclusions on this because actually the NHS has been doing a terrific job and there will be other deaths outside of coronavirus that may or may not have happened had it been handled differently, without for example sufficient hospital capacity."
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Residents arriving in Scotland's care homes without negative test results
But new figures revealed on Sunday show the number of daily tests being carried out has fallen to below 80,000.
Statistics published by the UK Government indicate that a total of 76,496 tests were carried out in the 24 hours up to 9am on May 3.
On Friday, Health Secretary Matt Hancock announced that the Government's target of 100,000 tests a day by the end of April had been achieved, with more than 122,000 tests having been provided on the last day of the month.
Since then, the number has dropped by about 40,000 according to official statistics. Overall, a total of 1,206,405 coronavirus tests have been carried out in the UK since the beginning of April.
At the UK Government's daily briefing on Sunday, NHS England's national medical director Professor Stephen Powis, said: "You will see that testing capacity has ramped up very quickly over the last week or so and we are now at a very high level of testing, over 100,000 - a little bit of a dip in the weekend, but we anticipate that that testing capacity will continue to increase."
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Michael Gove said that steps taken to extend testing would help get more people back to work.
He said: "We have now of course extended the criteria for testing beyond key workers to anyone over 65 displaying symptoms, and anyone who has to travel to get to work. "And
"This week, we will be piloting new test, track and trace procedures on the Isle of Wight with a view to having them in place more widely later this month.
"All of these steps will help us to get more people back to work and help to support the delivery of our public services."
Mr Shapps also warned that the UK will not return to "business as usual" this month. He told Sky's Sophy Ridge On Sunday: "I don't think we should expect us to go from this situation that we have at the moment of social distancing back to where we were in February - that's clearly not going to happen and I don't think anyone imagines that for one moment.
"The most important thing is that the absolute focus of what the Prime Minister will be announcing later in the week is that what we do do going forward doesn't undo the brilliant work people have been doing to get that R number below 1 - the all-critical reproduction rate doesn't come back up because that's when we'd see a second spike.
"So no I'm afraid it is definitely not going to be business as usual but we do want to make sure that people understand where the routemap lies."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel