IRAQ’S prime ministerial merry-go-round continues to spin apace. Spy chief Mustafa al-Kadhimi, director of the country’s National Intelligence Service, is now the third prime minister designate this year, following the withdrawal of the two previous prospective candidates.

They failed to secure enough support to form a government after the fall of caretaker controller Adil Abdul-Mahdi, the shady former prime minister and puppet of the Iranian mullahs, who was forced to resign last November amidst widespread protests.

Past winners of the post have become quickly enriched, turning the contest into something akin to the TV quiz show Who Wants to be a Millionaire.

Al-Kadhimi grew up in the southern governate of Dhi Qar, a hotbed of anti-government dissent. As a lawyer and journalist who opposed Saddam Hussein, he fled from Iraq in 1985 and continued to launch vocal attacks on the dictator from his exile first in Iran, then Germany and finally in the UK, where he set up the Iraq Memory Foundation, an organisation that listed all of the crimes committed by Hussein. He returned to Iraq after the US invasion in 2003 and was appointed as head of the National Intelligence Service in 2016. Al-Kadhimi claims not to be affiliated to any of Iraq’s political parties.

Iraq’s President Barham Salih hosted a special televised designation ceremony for al-Kadhimi, attended by most of the country’s top political figures, as a show of solidarity for the 53-year-old spy chief. None of the previous designated contenders for the post had been honoured with a similar ceremony. Prominent at the event was Iranian General Esmail Qaani, who is now head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Qods Force. The IRGC and the Qods Force have both been listed as terrorist organisations by the US State Department.

Under the Iraqi constitution, a prime minister designate has 30 days to secure the backing of parliament for his new government. This has been the stumbling block for each of Abdul-Mahdi’s successors, as they have attempted to gain the approval of the deeply divided and sectarian factions that make up parliament. The biggest problem for each of the prospective prime ministers has been obtaining the blessing of the Iranian regime, who now regard Iraq as a servile province. Al-Kadhimi must present his nominees for the cabinet to the Iraqi Council of Representatives by May 9.

Initially he appeared to have won the backing of all of the main Shi’ite parties, as well as the key Kurdish and Sunni factions. Crucially, he also seemed to have been given the green light by the Iranian mullahs, despite objections from Kataib Hezbollah, one of Iraq’s more dangerous Iranian-backed terrorist militias.

However, in the past few days al-Kadhimi has broken his silence to admit that he is facing problems over his choice of cabinet. The pro-Iran factions who had previously backed him are now demanding that he appoints their nominees to the key ministerial offices of defence, interior, finance and foreign affairs, leaving him entirely under the thumb of Tehran and with no real power.

Al-Kadhimi has said that if he manages to form a government, he will seek to cooperate with the US on the issue of a continuing American military presence in Iraq, to lead the fight against the Islamic State (ISIS). But, if al-Kadhimi bows to pressure and appoints pro-Iranian Shi’ia militants to each of the key cabinet posts, it will inflame the protesters who overthrew the previous prime minister for the same reason and it will alienate American support. To try to pacify his critics, Al-Kadhimi has suggested calling early “free and fair” elections to gain approval for his choice of government, although free and fair elections would be something of a novelty in a country where the polling stations are guarded by militias, armed and financed by Tehran.

Although the coronavirus curfew has driven most of the protesters out of their encampment in Baghdad’s Tahrir Square and off the streets of Iraq’s towns and cities, their demand for a government of independent technocrats to replace the venally corrupt political elite is still bubbling under the surface.

Demonstrators in the nationwide uprising in Iraq last October and November blamed government incompetence and corruption and the ruling elite’s slavish subservience to the oppressive Iranian regime, for the country’s collapsing economy and security breakdown. But such is the extent of the institutionalised corruption and Iranian meddling in Iraq’s internal affairs, that al-Kadhimi, like his predecessors, will find it difficult to appoint a cabinet that meets the demands of the protesters and the approval of the political factions.

As prime minister, assuming he wins the approval of the deeply divided and sectarian parliament, he faces a daunting task. After years of mismanagement and corruption, Iraq is a basket case. Its economy has been destroyed and its security devolved to pro-Iranian warlords. The collapse in oil prices, coupled with the coronavirus pandemic have crippled the nation.

Al-Khadimi’s two pressing priorities will be to tackle corruption and to identify and hold to account those responsible for shooting dead hundreds of mostly young, unarmed protesters during the recent uprising. Unfortunately, the guilty parties in both cases are the very people he looks to for support as prime minister, so he is faced with an impossible task.

Taking over the helm of a failed state, ravaged by Covid-19, drained of resources by decades of corruption and ruled by corrupt Shi’ia warlords, is not an enviable prospect. As the compromise candidate, seen as bridging the divide between Iran and America, al-Kadhimi has already lost the support of the protesters and seems set to resort to the same tired, old strategy of sectarian conflict and disunion.

The moment the Covid-19 curfew ends, the protesters have made clear that they will take to the streets again in their tens of thousands, to rid Iraq of the Iranian regime’s gangsters and to restore a legitimate and accountable government in Baghdad. With another similar rebellion ready to explode in Iran, the turbaned tyrants in Tehran may be facing their closing chapter.

Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.