NICOLA Sturgeon has warned the country that lifting any of the lockdown restrictions any time soon might be impossible because the margins of manoeuvre are “very, very, very tight and narrow”.
Speaking in a pre-recorded interview on ITV’s Peston, the First Minister also insisted her advice on people wearing face coverings in restricted public places was “right for Scotland” but stressed she was not being critical of the UK Government’s approach for England.
In the interview, Ms Sturgeon said: “People talk about lifting the lockdown, that is not going to be a flick of the switch moment; we're going to have to be very careful, very slow, very gradual.
“I'm far from convinced at this stage that when we get to the next review point on May 7, we'll be in a position to lift any of these measures right now because the margins of manoeuvre that we're operating in right now are very, very, very tight and narrow."
Asked if she believed the UK Government had changed the language of the fifth test in order to prioritise protecting the NHS, the FM replied: "It is necessary to have as an objective not overwhelming the NHS but not sufficient to have that as your only objective.
“Because if you take the situation in Scotland right now, and this will be similar across the UK, we have the numbers of people in intensive care around just over 100 but we've got a capacity in intensive care of nearly 600. So, if your only objective was not overwhelming the NHS, I could say to you, well we could afford to have the numbers of people in intensive care quadrupling, and we still wouldn't be overwhelming the NHS."
On masks, asked why her advice to the Scottish public in certain situations differed from that of the UK Government, Ms Sturgeon replied: "It's right for Scotland and many of these responsibilities are within devolved responsibility here so I am accountable to the people of Scotland for these decisions.
“Now, the UK Government is taking a different decision as far as England is concerned. At the moment, I don't know; they may change that in future, and I'm not criticising them for that, we're all looking at the same advice on face masks, face coverings, just to be precise about this.
“The science is not overwhelming but the evidence and the scientific advice that we've seen says that there is some benefit from people, if they are having to be in enclosed spaces with other people, and it's not easy to socially distance, there is some benefit from wearing a cloth face covering.
“And to be clear what that benefit is: it's if you have the virus but you might not know it because you don't have symptoms, so you're not isolating as you should be if you have symptoms, then wearing that mask doesn't give you protection but it might reduce the chance of you passing on the virus to somebody else. Now my view is that if there is any benefit to be had from that, we should do it, which is why I made that recommendation."
The SNP leader was informed that in England inquests were being told not to look at a shortage of PPE when determining how people have died and was asked if that shortage might be a relevant consideration in Scottish fatal accident inquiries.
"Absolutely,” she declared but stressed she did not want to say much more because she had not heard about the development.
“But we also have a different system in Scotland. Fatal accident inquiries are held at the instruction of the Lord Advocate here and any remit would be set by them. But in general terms, I don't think in a situation like this, it wouldn't seem to me…to be logical to say that an inquest as it is in England or a fatal accident inquiry here couldn't look at PPE if they thought that was relevant to somebody's death."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel