KENNY MacAskill has been branded “unfit for office” by a leader of the SNP’s student wing after claiming ‘dark forces’ were at work in the Alex Salmond trial.
The former Justice Secretary, now the SNP MP for East Lothian, also claimed Mr Salmond’s lawyer may have been the victim of a conspiracy against the former First Minister.
Gordon Jackson QC quit as Dean of the Faculty of Advocates shortly after Mr Salmond’s trial when a video emerged of him appearing to name two of his client’s accusers on a train.
A court order had granted the women anonymity for life.
Writing about the case in the new issue of the Scottish Left Review, Mr MacAskill said: “The poison that had flowed before and even during the trial has continued unabated.
“Amongst their victims was Gordon Jackson QC whose real ‘crime’ seems to have been to have represented Salmond.
“The manner in which he was brought down seems more than accidental.. It certainly seems that, as well as the poison and prejudice of a few, there were other ‘dark forces’ operating.”
READ MORE: MacAskill says ‘dark forces’ were at work in Salmond trial
Chris Duffy, national secretary of SNP Students, said Mr MacAskill’s remarks showed “a level of delusion that should mark him as unfit for office”.
He tweeted: “I'm sure his constituents will be thrilled to hear that he has absolutely no faith in the Scottish Criminal Justice system because credible accusations were made against his mate.
“Mr MacAskill would do well to remember that he's an MP and thus should not be involved in flights of fantasy if he wants to be taken seriously by his colleagues, constituents and those he interacts with on their behalf.
“If he wants to do conspiracy theories he should start a blog.”
I'm sure his constituents will be thrilled to hear that he has absolutely no faith in the Scottish Criminal Justice system because credible accusations were made against his mate. Remember when we all laughed in 2014 at Lord Robertson talking about the forces of Darkness? https://t.co/Js52HaiqjZ
— Chris Duffy (@OtherChrises) April 28, 2020
Mr Salmond was acquitted of 13 charges of sexual assault at the High Court in Edinburgh last month, and is now writing a book which will air evidence he could not present in court.
His friends claim he was the victim of a plot within the Scottish Government and SNP to stop him returning to frontline politics and rivalling Nicola Sturgeon.
In his SLR article, Mr MacAskill said senior figures in the SNP and Scottish Government wanted Mr Salmond’s head “on a platter” and had tried to engineer his disgrace.
He criticised the Crown Office for bringing charges he considered “utter bunkum” and the police for mounting an investigation of “gargantuan proportions” while simultaneously complaining about a squeeze on their budgets.
The phrase “dark forces” was famously attributed to the Queen after the death of Princess Diana in 1997, and fuelled conspiracy theories about foul play in the car crash that killed her and her boyfriend Dodi Fayed in a Paris underpass.
Royal butler Paul Burrell, who first claimed the Queen had said it to him, later retracted it.
However it is still used about the security services and other shadowy arms of the state.
Labour and the Tories have accused Mr MacAskill of paranoia and peddling conspiracy theories better suited to the murkier corners of the internet.
Mr MacAskill’s intervention coincides with another of Mr Salmond’s supporters floating the idea of a new independence party to replace the SNP.
Former SNP deputy leader Jim Sillars said the former FM’s book would be like a “volcanic eruption” for those at the top of the SNP, and that the “rot” inside the party may be so bad that the Yes movement may need to set up a new party in it place.
The comments suggest Ms Sturgeon faces a manor political battle with her predecessor once the coronavirus crisis has abated.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel