ONE of Scotland’s largest local councils has warned “radical action” will be needed amid fears the authority could lose more than £53 million if the Covid-19 pandemic lasts for six months.
Edinburgh City Council, which was being forced to make almost £35 million of savings from its annual budget, before the coronavirus outbreak, has given the stark assessment of the lockdown on its attempt to balance the books this year.
READ MORE: Coronavirus in Scotland: Lockdown 'may be eased and reimposed repeatedly'
In a report, initially to be discussed in private, officials warn that “the full financial implications will only emerge over time”.
It adds: "Taken together, Covid-19 related expenditure or income losses, anticipated shortfalls in approved savings delivery and unmitigated residual pressures total £39.2m under the three-month scenario and £53.5m for the six-month equivalent.
"Given the magnitude of these pressures, radical action is likely to be required whilst continuing to impress upon the UK and Scottish Governments the gravity of the financial impact for local government services both in the immediate and longer term.”
The six-month scenario, set out by council finance bosses, indicates “a complete three-month shutdown followed by a further three-month period during which activities gradually return to normal”.
Edinburgh City Council could lose up to £8.6 million on lost on-street parking revenues, while loss in parking enforcement could total more than £2 million.
READ MORE: Coronavirus in Scotland: Edinburgh's economy set for £300m hit after festivals axed
The authority expects it could lose £6 million on rent not being paid on council-owned property and another £3 million on unpaid council tax.
Temporary accommodation costs for the city’s homelessness services could rise by an additional £3 million and the council’s children’s services could lose more than £2.5 million under the six-month scenario.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel