MPs are today expected to approve plans for "virtual" sittings of the Commons when the House returns from its Easter recess.
Under proposals drawn up by the House authorities, MPs will be able to contribute to proceedings at Westminster - including questioning ministers - through video links.
The initial cost of development amounts to £148,793 and the running costs for maintaining the system are estimated at £369,267 per month, according to a memorandum published by John Benger, the Commons Clerk, as part of his role as accounting officer.
Up to 50 MPs will still be able to be present in the chamber, although they are being strongly encouraged to stay away.
To approve the new "hybrid" arrangement, the House will need to sit physically this afternoon to vote the plans through.
Strict social distancing arrangements will be in force with MPs required to sit two metres apart.
It is unclear how many will attend with views divided among those who believe they have a duty to be present and others committed to staying away.
If it does go through, it will mean the new arrangements will be in place for Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday, with Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab standing in for Boris Johnson. It is understood Sir Keir Starmer, the new Labour leader, will represent the Opposition via video-link.
The motion states the orders relating to the "hybrid" arrangement will have effect until May 12, although they could be extended by a further motion.
Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle said it would be an "historic" moment for the Commons and that if it went well, MPs could move to a fully "virtual" House.
"It will be a historic moment in our 700-year history to have MPs contributing to Prime Minister's Questions, urgent questions and statements via video link from the safety of their own homes and offices," explained Sir Lindsay.
"If it works, the House will consider extending the measures to a fully virtual Parliament as quickly as possible to include debates on motions and legislation and even a system of remote voting," he added.
Elsewhere, he was asked if the Commons dress code would apply and replied: "Yes. The rules and the courtesies of the House will be extended to the virtual parliament.” But he warned MPs to consider their backdrops carefully. “Please think what’s behind you, think what’s on your bookshelf, think what else will be picked up in this shot because, quite rightly, the journalists will be having a field day.”
The House of Lords, which also returns today, will have a mix of online and in-person proceedings, again with peers encouraged to stay away.
Lord Speaker Lord Fowler, who will chair the upper chamber from home, said the House of Lords Commission would consider on Monday whether peers will be able to claim their daily attendance allowance of up to £305 a day for the virtual proceedings.
In the Commons, up to 120 MPs will be able to take part remotely through video-conferencing.
Experts from the National Cyber Security Centre have advised that the use of Zoom will be appropriate as long as the application's use is carefully managed.
A number of screens will be placed around the Commons chamber to allow the Speaker and MPs in Westminster to be able to see their homeworking colleagues.
MPs who wish to participate in proceedings will need to notify the House Service in advance and there will be a list of those chosen and the planned order in which they will be called.
Backbenchers will, as usual, be drawn at random although the Speaker will ensure opposition spokesmen and women and the relevant select committee heads are able to take part.
The initial system does not cover remote voting, although officials are working on developing a secure system which would also have to be approved by the House before it could be adopted.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here