Herald readers have voiced their concern after it was revealed that Boris Johnson skipped five Cobra meetings on coronavirus as the outbreak began to spread around the world.
It comes after The Sunday Times reported that Boris Johnson missed a number of the emergency meetings in January and February.
Michael Gove confirmed that Boris Johnson had missed key meetings however insisted the Prime Minister’s leadership had been “inspirational” during the coronavirus crisis.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson 'skipped five Cobra meetings on coronavirus and ignored scientist warnings'
Labour, the SNP and the Liberal Democrats demanded to know why Mr Johnson appeared to have been “missing in action” as the pandemic unfolded.
Many voiced their concern that the PM had missed meetings with some calling for Johnson to resign.
Campbell Johnson wrote: "The statement from the Downing Street spokesman beggars belief, bald-faced lies. This crumb of a PM enjoyed the best care the NHS could give but has had a personal hand in ensuring that NHS staff are sacrificing their lives in some instances through his Government's criminal negligence in failing to adequately equip them. How does he sleep at night? Do the decent thing for once and RESIGN."
Kenny Ross hit out at Johnson's actions saying: "Johnson has a remarkable track record of disappearing when the going gets tough, and throughout this crisis he's excelling at it.
"I've no doubt at all that when/if we get through this, Johnson will remarkably appear again to claim the glory."
Martin Stevenson had a slightly different view writing: "Mistakes have been made by Westminster and Holyrood and they are all unfortunately still building on their mistakes. They all knew this was coming. Were all their much-quoted 'scientific advisers' and 'experts' just ignored in December, January and February?"
Stewart Bremner responded directly saying "The mistake you are making, is believing that Bojo is no more guilty of arrogance and gross negligence than anyone else, wrong he was supposed to be the leading voice not the locker room joker."
Brigit Page suggested that others were to blame commenting: "Why no mention of the fact that this was all the fault of China or the fact that the WHO sat on it until it was too late. Let's just bash Boris despite the fact that he nearly died."
Joyce Malloy added: "The PM has been "at the helm" of a ship of fools, aligning himself with Admiral Trump."
Charlie Maguire added: "Johnson's doing a terrible job. He had plenty of warning about the possible spread of Covid-19 but did little in response. PPE shortages, delays in initiating a lockdown, fiascos in testing, doing nothing about mass gatherings up to mid-March, even though they were being stopped in other countries. Did he nearly die? If so, why should that make a blind bit of difference to evaluations of his leadership in the crucial period before and after this virus took a grip?"
William Logan said: "It is my understanding that Cobra meetings are not necessarily attended by the PM and they are often headed by the relevant Secretary of State. As an example, a meeting regarding PPE would be headed by the Health Secretary and that's how government works."
J Williamson wrote: "The top line here is, people have died and people are still dying. Many more than should have died because of the incompetence of the UK government. It won't be forgotten."
Courtney Macgregor simply wrote: "The levels of incompetence he displays, is stratospheric."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel