A senior government adviser has slammed the Prime Minister for 'skipping five Cobra meetings on coronavirus' as the outbreak worsened in China and began to spread around the world.
Boris Johnson missed a number of the emergency meetings in January and February, just as the outbreak started to worsen, according to a report by The Sunday Times.
An investigation by the newspaper found that dire warnings were ignored from scientists, meaning the UK lost 'a crucial five weeks in the fight to tackle the dangerous threat of coronavirus'.
Now, the PM's leadership has come under fire from a senior government advisor, who accused him of not going 'urgent crisis planning'.
READ MORE: 8,000 a week still arriving in Scotland – and not one is tested for Covid-19
“There’s no way you’re at war if your PM isn’t there," the advisor, who has not been named, told the newspaper. “And what you learn about Boris was he didn’t chair any meetings. He liked his country breaks. He didn’t work weekends.
"It was like working for an old-fashioned chief executive in a local authority 20 years ago.
"There was a real sense that he didn’t do urgent crisis planning.
"It was exactly like people feared he would be.”
However, Michael Gove has strongly defended Boris Johnson on Sky News's Sophy Ridge on Sunday.
The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster said: “The idea that the Prime Minister skipped meetings that were vital to our response to the coronavirus, I think is grotesque.”
Mr Johnson is alleged to have been absent from one meeting, however, attended Chinese New Year celebrations just one week later.
The other meetings are understood to have been skipped in order for the PM to prioritise Brexit and his cabinet reshuffle, before then spending two weeks of the half-term break with his pregnant fiancee.
The first Cobra meeting suspected to have been attended by Boris Johnson was on March 2 - when the virus had already begun to spread in the UK.
At the beginning of the year, the Government affirmed the threat from coronavirus was 'low'.
READ MORE: Questions raised over population surveillance as GPs say virus testing not happening at Covid hubs
In January, health secretary Matt Hancock told the House of Commons: "The Chief Medical Officer continues to advise that the risk to the UK population is “low” and has concluded that while there is an increased likelihood that cases may arise in this country, we are well prepared and well equipped to deal with them."
However, the Government has now been accused of failing to prepare for the outbreak, particularly with Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).
The newspaper was told by a government source that ministers were slow to respond to the COVID-19 threat - even in February.
They said: “Almost every plan we had was not activated in February.
"Almost every government department has failed to properly implement their own pandemic plans."
A Downing Street spokesman responded to the newspaper's reports, saying: "Our response has ensured that the NHS has been given all the support it needs to ensure everyone requiring treatment has received it, as well as providing protection to businesses and reassurance to workers.
"The prime minister has been at the helm of the response to this, providing leadership during this hugely challenging period for the whole nation."
________________________________________________________________
News from trusted and credible sources is essential at all times, but especially now as the coronavirus pandemic impacts on all aspects of our lives. To make sure you stay informed during this difficult time our coverage of the crisis is free.
However, producing The Herald's unrivalled analysis, insight and opinion on a daily basis still costs money and, as our traditional revenue streams collapse, we need your support to sustain our quality journalism.
To help us get through this, we’re asking readers to take a digital subscription to The Herald. You can sign up now for just £2 for two months.
If you choose to sign up, we’ll offer a faster loading, advert-light experience – and deliver a digital version of the print product to your device every day.
Thank you, and stay safe.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel