SOCIAL distancing and isolation are necessary, but police closing parks and telling people they must keep moving isn’t. You can stay two metres from someone who’s isn’t moving. The disabled, ill and elderly, who can’t keep moving non-stop, need sunlight and outdoor time for their mental and physical health.
The UK Government failed to prepare for a respiratory virus pandemic. In 2017 it rejected advice from the Department of Health’s new and emerging respiratory virus threat advisory group to stockpile eye protection for NHS staff. NHS exercise Cygnus simulating such a pandemic found it would run out of ventilators and protective equipment (PPE) for staff. Rather than buying more, the Government made the final report classified.
The Government seemed to make few preparations and take no serious measures to stop Covid-19 spreading to the UK. Other than a couple of hundred who’d been in or near Wuhan, people flying here from China, Iran or Italy were neither tested for the virus, nor quarantined. It was mid-March before any serious isolation measures were taken in the UK.
The Make It British group of companies say they’ve offered to make more PPE, but the Government ignored them. Health Secretary Matt Hancock urging NHS staff to treat PPE as a “precious resource” is an attempt to blame NHS staff for Government failure. Using the same gloves and mask will spread not just Covid-19 but other viruses and bacterial infections between patients.
South Korea shows the most effective containment method is mass testing, contract tracing through mobile phone records, and protective equipment. Sadly, we’ve lost time to make this fully effective due to our lack of lab testing capacity and late Government action.
This must not result in the Government shifting blame to the public. Isolation is a necessity at the moment; but enough testing and contact tracing could eventually replace it. The vast majority follow the rules. Photos claiming they’re being broken forget there may be three or more people living in the same house or flat.
Duncan McFarlane, Carluke.
WHY must it be the case that the youngest generation and those below the age of 70 have to suffer varying degrees of privation for the sake of the older generation, of which I am one?
For the last two days I have read the obituaries in the Herald and in all but two cases out of at least 20 I could identify the deaths as being of men and women old enough to be grandparents.
I am appalled that a virus that we are told primarily seriously affects or kills those deemed vulnerable – that is, those with serious underlying health conditions and the very old, results in children and their young parents in lockdown for weeks on end without the prospect of change. No government has given reason to hope that the present lockdown will be eased, for any group, any time soon.
We need young people to keep the economy going and I for one would be ready to continue to stay in lockdown if I knew that parents could resume a more normal life and little children could access the locked play parks again.
Can we not agree that those in good health, those who are tasked to build all our futures be allowed to have their lives less restricted? By all means ask them to be careful, maintain social distancing wherever possible and restrict access to older people. Or must everyone follow the diktats of those who probably have never lived in a high-rise tenement with children indoors for as much as 23 out of 24 hours a day? We are not all suffering equally, as usual it is the poorest, most vulnerable in society who suffer most in a crisis.
Kay Gall, Edinburgh EH14.
SOMETIMES, when as a child I asked where was my father, I would be told that "he is sitting with someone", from which I knew he was with a person who was doing that strange-to-me thing, dying. As an elder in our Welsh chapel he had a certain way with him to comfort people. People, of all religious beliefs round our home area would say "send for Elwyn" and he would keep the "night watch". Then be at work the next day.
When it was his time to die, he was at my home so my late husband, my mother and I were there for the weeks of his last illness. Even when he was dying my mother always shared their bed and he was never alone. The doctor and district-nurse were constant presences. His last day, as I was at work, I was phoned and broke the sound barrier to get home to be with him. I lay on his bed, held his hand and whispered. He always knew that I loved him, as he loved me. My splendid old dad.
The last few paragraphs of the article by Professor Andrew Elder ("Let us find ways to allow families to be together at the end of life", Agenda, The Herald, April 16) really struck a chord. I can live with myself because I was at my father's dying and he knew that we all loved him; he was not alone. My daughter's suicide, 24 years ago, meant she was totally alone, I could not be with her so the pain and grief are never-ending. Prof Elder is quite right when he says: "We can find ways to allow families to be together at this time". Surely that is possible?
Thelma Edwards, Kelso.
I WHOLEHEARTEDLY agree with Alan Simpson about the increasing number of people, with no medical qualifications, claiming to have the right answer to the Covid-19 pandemic ("Keyboard ‘experts’ should shut up about Covid-19",The Herald, April 16). I might add the increasingly annoying TV channel interviewers, who seem totally unable to listen to clear answers, given to their increasingly repetitive questions.
As a retired GP, I am sure they will all soon perfect the use of an instrument which I found regularly to be 100 per cent successful: the retrospectoscope.
Stuart Holms, Ayr.
News from trusted and credible sources is essential at all times, but especially now as the coronavirus pandemic impacts on all aspects of our lives. To make sure you stay informed during this difficult time our coverage of the crisis is free.
However, producing The Herald's unrivalled analysis, insight and opinion on a daily basis still costs money and, as our traditional revenue streams collapse, we need your support to sustain our quality journalism.
To help us get through this, we’re asking readers to take a digital subscription to The Herald. You can sign up now for just £2 for two months.
If you choose to sign up, we’ll offer a faster loading, advert-light experience – and deliver a digital version of the print product to your device every day. Click here to help The Herald.
Thank you, and stay safe.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel