NICOLA Sturgeon has confirmed she is actively examining ways to end the coronavirus lockdown after saying slowing hospital admissions were grounds for “cautious optimism”.
The First Minister said she hoped to share the Scottish Government’s decision-making process with the public “in the coming days”.
She said possible options included lifting the restrictions in phases, with different parts of the country and the economy potentially re-opening at different speeds.
However she stressed no firm decisions had yet been taken, and a uniform relaxation of the measures might ultimately prove simplest.
The current lockdown of schools and businesses, now in its fourth week, has seen a slowing of admissions to hospitals and ICU patient numbers in recent days.
However it has also brought forecasts of a catastrophic 35 per cent reduction in the UK economy if it continues to the summer. It is expected to last at least six weeks.
Ms Sturgeon reported the number of people in hospital in Scotland with Covid-19 had dropped overnight by 53 to 1748, while the number in intensive care was down one to 195.
She said: “These hospital and ICU figures do give us cause for some very cautious optimism at this stage – but I want to caution again that it is too early to be definitive about that.
“So my caution is not against cautious optimism but against reading too much into these figures at this point.”
Ms Sturgeon said she didn’t know what the future held with coronavirus, but said it would not disappear anytime soon, and the long-term strategy would be to “manage and suppress” it.
She said: “What is it we need to see in terms of the spread of the virus before we could start to think of lifting these measures?
“Obviously we want to see transmission suppressed as much as possible, hospitalisations, ICU numbers, and deaths falling.
“What then could you look to do in terms of lifting some of these measures?
“What impact would that have on the spread of the virus?
“Are there some measures you could lift earlier than others or are there different stratifications you could have - and please don’t take this as decisions, these are the different factors that come to play - could you have different approaches for different groups of the population, or different kinds of business for example.
“These are the kinds of things we are starting to think through.”
She said the virus would still need to be suppressed in future, and if there was no longer a lockdown, that suppression would have to come through a vaccine and other treatments.
She expected the future strategy to include “test, trace and isolate”, the rigorous form of contact tracing that has helped South Korea and other Asian countries contain Covid-19.
Asked if Scotland’s islands communities could comes out of lockdown ahead of busier cities, Ms Sturgeon said: “We are still at a relatively early stage of looking at the options.
“The important thing right now is making sure the lockdown is having the effect in suppressing the virus and getting the evidence of that.
“But, yes, we are starting to think about the different options, and we have been thinking about the different options for coming out of this, when that is appropriate to do.
“That could be different measures at different times, it could be different groups of the population at different times, but these are all ‘ifs’ at the moment.
“We’ve got to look at what any approach would do in terms of spread of the virus, the practicality of things, the ease of reintroducing things if we suddenly decided that was necessary, and of course the simplicity of messaging.
“The simplest way of telling people what they need to do is if we’re giving the same message to every part of the country rather than have geographic variations.
“But if the evidence tells us we need to do something different then of course that’s what we’ll do, because we need to do what is required.
For sometime all of it will involve asking the public to live their lives in ways different to what we are all used to. So we will continue to be open about this as our thinking develops.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel